Laserfiche WebLink
EAR BASED FUTURE LAND USE MAP CHANGES <br />Among the conclusions of the county's Evaluation and Appraisal Report was that the county's future <br />land use map generally was working well. The EAR found that development had occurred in areas <br />where appropriate urban services were available, and in a compact manner that is compatible with <br />surrounding areas. Additionally, the EAR found that all county facilities were meeting their adopted <br />levels of service. <br />The EAR, however, did recommend several relatively minor future land use map changes. Those <br />changes were identified and justified in the EAR On February 24, 1997, DCA found the entire <br />EAR, including the proposed future land use map amendments, to be sufficient. At the November <br />4, 1997 Transmittal Public Hearing, those changes were included as part of the EAR based <br />amendments presented to the Board At that hearing, the Board made the following minor <br />modifications to the proposed future land use map amendments: <br />e The Board chose to retain the R, Rural (up to 1 unit/acre) land use designation rather than <br />redesignating 1,115 acres of R designated land to L-1, Low -Density Residential-1(up to 3 <br />units/acre); and <br />• The Board chose to redesignate +37.9 acres, rather than *160 acres, located at the southwest <br />corner of 660 Avenue and 331d Street, from L-1, Low-DensitY Residential -I (up to 3 <br />units/acre) to L-2, Low -Density Residential -2 (up to 6 units/acre). <br />The result of both of those changes was a decrease in the land use designation density of the affected <br />areas and, therefore, a decrease in potential impacts. Thus, the analysis and justification presented <br />in the EAR still applies. <br />Nevertheless, it is necessary to adpublic facilities impacts and eve plan coruds=cY <br />for the four remaining EAR based future land use map changes. Those changes are identified and <br />discussed below. <br />Change +379 acres, located at the southwest corner of 661 Avenue and 331 Street, from L-1 <br />to L-2. <br />The site, currently designated L-1, Low Density Residential -1 (up to 3 unitslacre), is depicted on <br />attachment 3. This amendment would change the land use designation of the site to L-2, Low - <br />Density Residential -2 (up to 6 units/acre). The site and all surrounding lands consist Primarily of <br />citrus groves. Land abutting flie site on the south is designated L 2, as is land to the east. across 66th <br />Avenue. Land abutting the site on the west is designated L-1. Land north of the site, across 33id <br />Street, is designated AG -1, Agricultural (up to 1 unit(5 acres). That land is outside of the urban <br />service area. <br />Classified as an arterial roadway on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map, 661h Avenue is a 2 - <br />lane paved road with 70 feet of public road right-of-way. It is programmed to expand to 120 feet <br />and 4 lanes by 2010. The site also fronts 331d Street, a 2 -lane collector road with 60 feet of public <br />road right-of-way. No improvements are currently planned for 331' Street <br />The most intense use of the site under the proposed land use designation would be 227 single-family <br />residences. A review of the traffic impacts that would result from such a development on the subject <br />property indicates that the existing level of service "D" or better on impacted roadways would not <br />be lowered The site fi f nmation used for determining traffic impacts is as follows: <br />1. For Single -Family Units in 6th Edition ITE Manual: <br />a. P.M. Peak Hour Trip Ends:1.01/urnit <br />b. Inbound (P.M. Peak Hour): 65% <br />i. Northbound (PAL Peak Hour): 53% <br />ii. Southbound (P.M. Peak Hour): 471/6 <br />C. Outbound (P.M. Peak Hour): 35% <br />i. Northbound (P.M. Peak Hour): 47% <br />H. Soutthbound (P.M. Peak Hour): 53% <br />2. Peak Direction of 666 Avenue (link receiving the most trips), from 26* Street to 41" Street: <br />northbound <br />MARCH 10, 1998 <br />0 -40- <br />