My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/17/1998
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1998
>
3/17/1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:56 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 10:43:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/17/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 0 <br />In addition, Attorney Collins advised he received copies of additional correspondence <br />yesterday, which he reviewed. It was clear to him that in the spring of 1987, there were a <br />number of transactions being negotiated with property owners along 53' Street, not only <br />with Mr. Hatala, but several others, and there was a lot of correspondence back and forth. <br />Grand Harbor was actually seeking traffic impact fee credits for about $54,000 for building <br />the road from the Boulevard east to the River Club. Those credits were not ultimately given; <br />they were denied Grand Harbor because that portion of the road is not a collector road <br />eligible for the credits. Based on all that correspondence, he could understand some of the <br />confusion with Mr. Henderson writing on behalf of Grand Harbor and Mr. Hatala at the same <br />time. He explained that the County Attorney's office has the opinion that the County would <br />have an affirmative defense of latches. Also, there is no question that Mr. Hatala donated <br />the right-of-way; the deed was delivered in escrow and the County has built a road on <br />property that he formerly owned. The County does not know whether he was compensated <br />for it by Grand Harbor. He understood that Grand Harbor extended the water lines, and <br />asked Mr. Hatala if Grand Harbor ever compensated him for the property towards US 1. <br />Mr. Hatala stated that Grand Harbor had never compensated him for the property at <br />US 1. He stated that the Grand Harbor/Hatala reference occurred when he gave Grand <br />Harbor the 894' feet. <br />Attorney Collins stated that the application that Mr. Henderson filed on behalf of Mr. <br />Hatala applied for impact fee credits for the entire 53' Street. The impact fee credits were <br />only allowed from US 1 to the Boulevard. At this point, it appears the County would have <br />some legal defenses, but it appeared the Mr. Hatala was the innocent party and he thought <br />Mr. Hatala should not be the one to suffer. <br />In response to Commissioner Adams, Attorney Collins stated that staffrecommended <br />that Mr. Hatala file suit for declaratory judgment and the County defend it. <br />Mrs. Leonard Hatala pointed out that impact fee credits were given for development <br />and the land is still not developed. She believed that the County has erred and they do not <br />want to take responsibility. <br />Vice Chairman Macht asked who had the fiduciary responsibility, and Attorney <br />Collins replied that Mr. Henderson was the agent for both. <br />Commissioner Ginn had reviewed the backup chronologically and favored Alternative <br />2 (Allow the traffic impact fee credits to Mr. Hatala and reimburse the trust account for <br />traffic impact fee district 4). <br />March 17,1998 <br />Cpl <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.