Laserfiche WebLink
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners agree to participate as a one-third cost -share <br />partner in the Carson Platt Estate purchase, using county environmental land bond funds, contingent <br />upon the County obtaining an undivided one-third title interest in the property. Moreover, staff <br />recommends that the Board approve the attached Resolution, and authorize staff and a member of the . <br />Board to attend the Governor and Cabinet hearing on the purchase (tentatively scheduled for May 28, <br />1998). <br />Chief of Environmental Planning Roland DeBlois stated the Carson Platt Estate <br />property is ranked number 2 of about 22 LAAC properties and is a very environmentally <br />important property. The State has revised the participation agreement to a 1/3rd participation <br />on the part of the State, the County and St. Johns River Water Management District. <br />However, they are not offering an ownership interest in the property to the County. <br />SJRWMD has approved the 1/3rd participation, conditioned upon the County's agreement <br />to be a 1/3rd partigipant. If approved by this Board, the public hearing is scheduled for May <br />28' in Tallahassee. LAAC recommends this participation increase only under the condition <br />that the County receive an undivided interest in the property and SJRWMD supports the <br />position of the County taking title to an undivided interest in the property. State staff has <br />advised that one other alternative is for the State to pay 501/o, with SJRWMD and the County <br />each paying 25% and the County being satisfied with a right of re-entry, rather than an <br />undivided interest in the property. Purchase of a participation in this property would fulfill <br />the County's obligations under the Comprehensive Plan. <br />Commissioner Macht emphasized that he was ready to draw the proverbial line in the <br />sand as far as the State not sharing title with local governments. He felt that offering an <br />ownership interest to SJRWMD and not to the County is very insulting. He believed that the <br />State's desire to negotiate is evidenced by their counteroffer and was ready to tell the State <br />they could buy the whole thing. He advocated going before the Governor and the Cabinet <br />to stress that the County will not participate without an equitable title interest. He has asked <br />the legal staff to introduce a modification to LAAC that the County will not purchase <br />property without a title interest in the future. That modification will be presented to LAAC <br />at their next meeting. <br />The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard <br />regarding this matter. <br />APRIL 14, 1998 <br />s K. <br />-65-�� Fri. <br />J . <br />