Laserfiche WebLink
60OK <br />The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in <br />this matter. <br />Bruce Barkett, attorney, advised that he was present to answer any questions. He <br />commended staff for their accommodation of an existing problem and on a nice job of <br />putting it together. <br />It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the <br />public hearing. <br />There was CONSENSUS to agree with staff's recommendation. <br />9. Reladonships Between Zoning Districts and Land Use <br />Designations <br />�o <br />Director Boling briefly summarized the information and recommendations contained <br />in the memorandum above concerning this proposed amendment. <br />Chairman Tippin asked if the Commissioners had any questions. <br />Commissioner Ginn had discussed with Director Boling the first recommended <br />change concerning 911.06(3)(a) for Agricultural and Rural districts. She felt the second <br />phrase of the last sentence on (b), page 25 of the proposed Ordinance, was inappropriate and <br />asked that it be struck. (Delete: "and do not negatively impact the development of more <br />intense uses.") To support her request, she gave examples of specific properties that fell <br />under this provision. <br />Director Boling advised that staff had no objection. <br />There was CONSENSUS to remove the clause as suggested by Commissioner Ginn. <br />Commissioner Ginn had no further questions, but in response to some of her earlier <br />queries of staff, Director Boling advised that on page 26 of the proposed ordinance, they will <br />add meanings for RC, C/I, and PUB. <br />The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in <br />this matter. There being none, he closed the public hearing. <br />May 4, 1998 <br />20 <br />