Laserfiche WebLink
v'yy <br />[ 11 �� FrjUC bt� <br />The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 12, 1998: <br />TO: James E. Chandler <br />County Administrator <br />D ON HEAD CONCURRENCE: <br />Obert M. Keating, AMP <br />Community Developmen D' <br />1/196 <br />FROM: Stan Boling, AICP <br />Planning Director <br />DATE: May 12,1998 <br />SUBJECT: Final Hearing on Proposed LDR Amendments <br />It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County <br />Commissioners at its regular meeting of May 19, 1998. <br />At its May 4, 1998 special meeting, the Board of County Commissioners considered ten proposed <br />LDR amendments. At that meeting, the Board directed staff to make a few changes to some of the <br />amendments (see attachments #1 and #2). Those changes have been made and are incorporated into <br />the attached ordinance (see attachment #3). <br />The Board is now to take final action and approve, approve with modifications, or deny the proposed <br />ordinance. <br />ANALYSIS• <br />Minor changes have been made to 2 sections of the proposed ordinance, as follows: <br />-Mailed Notice Requirements <br />The proposed ordinance now reads in a manner that replaces the certified mail requirement with <br />regular mail and retains the surrounding property owner 300' notification "radius". <br />-Relationship Between Zoning and Land Use <br />The proposed ordinance eliminates the end of the last sentence of section 911.06(3)(b) and spells -out <br />the land use designations for the acronyms "C/1", "PUB", and "RC". <br />1=4 MWIT-IUMI) <br />The portion of the ordinance that codifies the SR 60 corridor plan development requirements differs <br />somewhat from the adopted corridor plan and will supercede the plan requirements. Because the <br />corridor plan was adopted by motion, it can be amended by motion. Therefore, to ensure that the <br />specific development requirements within the corridor plan are consistent with the SR 60 LDR <br />amendments, the Board needs to approve a motion to modify the plan requirements in accordance <br />with the LDRs and authorize staff to issue a revised and updated SR 60 Corridor Plan. <br />Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners: <br />1. Adopt the attached LDR amendment ordinance. <br />2. Modify the development requirements of the approved SR 60 Corridor Plan in accordance <br />with the SR 60 corridor LDRs, and authorize staff to issue a revised and updated SR 60 <br />Corridor Plan. <br />MAY 199 1998 <br />-10- <br />