My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/02/1998
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1998
>
6/02/1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:57 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 11:03:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/02/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />*Revised Landscape Plan <br />The revised landscape plan does not significantly differ from the previously approved plan (all <br />phases). Like the approved plan, the revised plan: accents and ties into the pattern of existing natural <br />and planted vegetation, lines the interchange ramps with trees, provides mass plantings within the <br />I-95 median, and provides sod for roadway edges to provide a clean look along roadway shoulders. <br />However, the revised plan goes further than the approved plan, by providing the following additions: <br />1. Expanding the original project area along SR 60 625' farther east and 30V farther west. <br />2. Providing special landscaping and irrigation within the SR 60 median (a curbed median is <br />now proposed) throughout the interchange area, approximately 1,000 feet east and 1,000 feet <br />_ west of the I-95 overpass. <br />3. Providing stamped, colored concrete hardscape features (in lieu of regular concrete) within <br />SR 60 median areas. <br />4. Providing simulated stone wall (made from pour concrete) planter terraces in lieu of regular <br />concrete slopes on the north and south sides of the overpass. Each terrace (three on each <br />slope) will be landscaped with low maintenance plantings such as jasmine, firecracker plant, <br />and bougainvillea. <br />5. Providing asphalt or stamped concrete shoulders underneath the overpass. Such <br />improvements would clean-up the sandy "no man's land" where trucks and vehicles now tend <br />to pull off and tear up the existing shoulder area. <br />As of the date of this report, staff is working with MOT on finalizing an installation budget, which <br />will range from $600,000 to a little over $800,000. Some changes in sod type (Bahia vs. St <br />Augustine) and corresponding irrigation coverage, and tree size at the time of planting, may be <br />adjusted to make FDOT's budget An itemized initial budget of $811,900 (Scenario "A") and a <br />revised budget of $632,900 (Scenario "B") can be found in attachment Q. It is likely that Scenario <br />"B" is what MOT will accept In that instance, irrigation and St Augustine sod will be used within <br />the SR 60 median only. <br />FDOT's consultants have provided maintenance estimate information that does not include annual <br />tree trimming, or factoring in replacement costs on an annualized basis. Based upon the consultant's <br />experience with and knowledge of other publically maintained landscape areas and interchanges, the <br />consultant agrees with county staff that an estimate of $24,000 per year should cover all maintenance <br />and annualized replacement costs associated with the proposed plan. Staff estimated that <br />maintenance of the previously approved landscape plan improvements would also be about $24,000 <br />per yam - <br />Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners: <br />1. Approve the revised conceptual landscape plan, and <br />2. Authorize the chairman to execute the modified cash deposit and escrow agreement <br />JUNE 2,1998 <br />0 -76- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.