6/9/1998 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

,bov� 106 fa 64 continues through the southern portion of the site to connect with 16' Street. The internal circulation system has been reviewed and approved by the county traffic engineering division, subject to driveway improvements discussed later in this report under "Dedications & Improvements". The applicant has submitted a traffic impact analysis for the proposed development, and that analysis has been reviewed and approved by the county's traffic engineering section. The traffic impact analysis indicates that a right turn deceleration lane is required at the project's entrance along SR 60. The applicant has depicted the deceleration lane on the site plan. Detailed construction plans approved by the FDOT will need to be submitted prior to site plan release, and the right turn lane will need to be constructed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 12. Stormwater Management: The public works department has reviewed and approved the conceptual stormwater management plan. Prior to issuance of a land development permit or land development permit waiver, the applicant must obtain a Type "A" stormwater management permit. 13. Coneurrency: The applicant has applied for initial concurrency and signed a concurrency acknowledgment form, which satisfies the project's concurrency requirements for preliminary PD plan approval. Thus, all concurrency requirements related to conceptual and preliminary PD plan approval have been satisfied. 14. Environmental Issues: •Uplands: Since the site pis over 5 acres, the native upland set-aside provisions could potentially apply to this project. However, the environmental planning staff has inspected the site and verified that the site is mainly existing grove and that no native upland plant community exists. Therefore, no set-aside requirement applies to this project. *Wetlands: The environmental planning staff has inspected the site and verified that no wetlands exist; therefore, no wetland regulations apply to this development. 15. Dedications & Improvements: The county's Thoroughfare Plan classifies SR 60 as a major urban arterial road which requires 200' of right-of-way. Presently, 172' of right-of-way exist for SR 60. Due to the presence of a canal right-of-way between this property and the SR 60 right-of-way, no additional right-of-way for SR 60 is required from this site. Presently, 30' of right-of-way exists for 161 Street. The county's Thoroughfare Plan classifies 16* Street as a collector road requiring 80' of right-of-way. The applicant will be dedicating an additional 50' of right-of-way for 161 Street to complete the 80' standard. While the applicant is allowed to use the gross area of the site for density calculation purposes, the county is giving compensation through density credit only for the right-of-way dedicated above the 60' local road standard. This type of density credit arrangement has been used for other projects within the county as allowed pursuant to LDR section 952.08(1)(e). The county's sidewalk and bikeway plan calls for a 5' sidewalk along the project's 16' Street frontage. However, since 161 Street is unpaved at this time, the sidewalk is not required of the developer. While the paving of 16* Street is not a required improvement for this project, the applicant is working with the county to formulate a developers agreement that compensates the developer for paving 161' Street from the project's entrance to 661 Avenue. The main issue with the developer's agreement is the county's ability to acquire 161 Street right-of-way June 9, 1998 56