Laserfiche WebLink
booK 106 PAGE 74 <br />This item was requested by the Building Official and Code Enforcement Officers <br />to clarify the Code with respect to the agricultural exemption to the building <br />code. <br />A public hearing date of June 9, 1998 was set by the Board of County <br />Commissioners. <br />Commissioner Adams wondered why this item had not been considered by the <br />Agricultural Advisory Committee because there had been no business to discuss at their last <br />meeting and this would have been a perfect opportunity to get some input from them. <br />Director Keating understood and apologized that it had not come before the <br />committee. <br />Commissioner Adams asked if it would be a problem if they defer it 30 days to send <br />it to the AAC for some input, and Director Keating responded it would not. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED <br />BY Commissioner Ginn, to defer the matter until after the <br />Agricultural Advisory Committee has considered it and made <br />their recommendation. <br />In response to an inquiry, County Attorney Vitunac believed they would have to re - <br />advertise and start all over. <br />The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in <br />this matter. <br />Glenn Legwen, 5900 5'b Street SW, agreed with Commissioner Adams' suggestion <br />and asked what about nurseries that have "AG exemptions". He thought there were some <br />who would like to put in some agricultural buildings that might apply. <br />It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the <br />public hearing. <br />Commissioner Adams wished to clarify that the exemption for bona fide agricultural <br />purposes fits everything that is presently occurring. The problem has arisen on small 5 -acre <br />June 9, 1998 <br />