My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/25/1998
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1998
>
8/25/1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:58 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 11:13:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/25/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK MG PAGE 037 <br />- Drainage <br />All developments are reviewed for compliance with county stormwater regulations which require <br />on-site retention, preservation of floodplain storage and minimum finished floor elevations. In <br />addition, development proposals must meet the discharge requirements of the county Stormwater <br />Management Ordinance. Any development on the subject property will be prohibited from <br />discharging any runoff in excess of the pre-ueveioprueut gate. <br />In this case, the minimum floor elevation level of service standard applies, since the property lies <br />within an AE flood zone, as designated on the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Flood <br />Insurance Rate Map. Consistent with Stormwater Management Sub -Element Policy 1.2 and section <br />930.07(2) of the county's LDRs, any new buildings constructed within an AE flood zone "must be <br />elevated a minimum of six inches above the base flood level." Since the subject property lies within <br />Flood Zone AE -9, any development on this property must have a minimum finished floor elevation <br />of no less than 9.5 feet above mean sea level. <br />Besides the minimum elevation requirement, on-site retention and discharge standards also apply <br />to this request. With the most intense use of this site, the maximum area of impervious surface under <br />the proposed zoning classifications will be approximately 1,278,050 square feet, or 29.34 acres. The <br />estimated runoff volume, based on that amount of impervious surface and the 25 year/24 hour design <br />storm, will be approximately 1,405,912 cubic feet. In order. to maintain the county's adopted level <br />of service, the applicant will be required to retain approximately 344,275 cubic feet of runoff on-site. <br />With the soil characteristics of the subject property, it is estimated that the pre -development runoff <br />rate is 230.41 cubic feet/second. <br />Based upon staffs analysis, the drainage level of service standards will be met by limiting off-site <br />discharge to its pre -development rate of 230.41 cubic feet/second, requiring retention of 344,275 <br />cubic feet of runoff for the most intense use of the property, and requiring that all finished floor <br />elevations exceed 9.5 feet above mean sea level. <br />As with all development, a more detailed review will be conducted during the development approval <br />process. <br />- Recreation <br />A review of county recreation facilities and the projected demand that would result from the most <br />intense development that could occur on the property under the proposed zoning classification <br />indicates that the adopted levels of service would be maintained. The table below illustrates the <br />additional park demand associated with the proposed development of the property and the existing <br />surplus acreage. <br />Park Information <br />LOS (Acres per 1,000 Population) <br />Project Demand (Acres) <br />Surplus Acreage <br />4.0 <br />2.70 <br />838.5 <br />Based on the analysis conducted, staff has determined that all concurrency -mandated facilities, <br />including drainage, roads, solid waste, recreation, water, and wastewater, have adequate capacity to <br />accommodate the most intense use of the subject property under the proposed zoning district. <br />Therefore, the concurrency test has been .satisfied for the subject request. <br />Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the comprehensive plan. <br />Rezoning requests must also be consistent with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on <br />August 25, 1998 <br />42 <br />0 0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.