My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/25/1998
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1998
>
8/25/1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:58 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 11:13:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/25/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Adams advised that when the City of Fellsmere goes to the State for <br />a grant, she will be a party to an agreement with several other businesses in town. She asked <br />Deputy County Attorney William G. Collins Il whether she should vote on this matter. <br />Attorney Collins advised that if the agreement would enure to her personal financial <br />gain, she should not vote. If she was one of a whole community of people who may benefit <br />from this, she could vote. He was not sure of the nature of the project, but if it was limited <br />to just commercial businesses, he suggested she not vote. <br />Commissioner Adams agreed that she would abstain from voting on this matter. <br />(CLERK'S NOTE: Form 8B, Memorandum of Voting Conflict was completed <br />by Commissioner Adams and is on file in the office of the Clerk to the Board.) <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED BY <br />Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously (4-0, <br />Commissioner Adams abstained) approved and authorized the <br />Chairman to execute the interlocal agreement with the City of <br />Fellsmere, as recommended in the Memorandum. <br />INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT IS ON FILE <br />IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD <br />U.B. VICE CHAIRMAN MACHT - COMMENT REGARDING A <br />LOCAL ARCHITECT'S OPINION ON COSTS OF CONVERTING <br />VERO MALL FOR A COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING <br />Vice Chairman Macht advised that a local architect, with a good track record, had <br />contacted him recently regarding the Spillis, Candela and Partners report on the use of the <br />Vero Mall for a County Administration Building. The architect was of the opinion that the <br />estimates were too high, that he could reduce the consultant's figures from $101 per square <br />foot to $75 per square foot. The architect asked if the Board would take into consideration <br />some information that he would submit in a relatively short time. Vice Chairman Macht had <br />informed the architect that there was nothing to prevent him from doing so and felt that it <br />would be worthwhile to listen to what he had to say. <br />August 25, 1998 <br />57 <br />UGK 10 6 PAGE�f2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.