My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/22/1998
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1998
>
9/22/1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:58 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 11:19:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/22/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Ginn felt there was one statement that says it clearly: "State funding <br />for State courts - Vote `yes' on Revision 7." <br />NO ACTION REQUIRED. <br />U Resolution 98 -096 -Hourly Fee for Court Appointed Counsel in <br />Dependency Proceedings <br />The Board reviewed a Memorandum of September 14, 1998: <br />TO: Board of County Commissioners <br />FROM: Terrence P. O'Brien, Assiscint County Attorney Tp <br />DATE: September 14, 1998 <br />SUBJECT: Compensation of Court Appointed Counsel -1998 Legislation <br />The legislature has amended the manner in which counsel is compensated pursuant to a <br />court appointment in dependency proceedings. Under former law, the court could <br />pretty much determine the amount of compensation. Now the compensation shall be <br />established by each County. The pertinent section of the Florida Statutes reads as <br />follows: <br />Section 39.0134 Anointed counsel: compensation. <br />If counsel is entitled to receive compensation for representation <br />pursuant to a court appointment in a dependency proceeding pursuant <br />to this chapter, such compensation shall be established by each county. <br />There appears to be two approaches from the County's standpoint, (1) set a per hour <br />fee for in -court and out-of-court work, (2) enter into a contract, after bids, for a set <br />amount for each case. This latter procedure is what we now use in criminal uses <br />where an attorney is court appointed. <br />As an initial step and as an interim measure it is recommended that we establish an <br />hourly fee and then direct staff to try the contract approach and see what bids we <br />receive. <br />A $65.00 out-of-court and a $75.00 in -court per hour fee is recommended. This is the <br />same fee appointed attorneys in capital cases are paid. <br />A Resolution establishing this per hour fee is attached for consideration. <br />I have spoken to Chief Judge Ranarek on this matter and we agree that a committee <br />should be formed to make recommendations as to an hourly fee and to look into <br />contracting out services. A committee of the Chief Judge or his designee, myself and a <br />member of the Indian River County Bar Association is recommended The bar <br />member would be selected by President of the IRC Bar Association. <br />September 22, 1998 <br />21 <br />BOOK 107 PAGE 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.