My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/22/1998
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1998
>
9/22/1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:58 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 11:19:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/22/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK i0-1' PAGE 95 1 <br />The subject property is not designated as environmentally important nor environmentally sensitive <br />by the comprehensive plan. No wetlands or native upland plant communities exist on site. <br />According to Flood Insurance Rating Maps, the subject property does not contain any flood hazard <br />areas. <br />The site is within the Urban Service Area of the county. Water lines extend to the site from the <br />South County Reverse Osmosis Plant. Wastewater lines extend to the site from the North Regional <br />Wastewater Treatment Plant. - <br />The site is bounded on the west by US 1. Classified as a rural principal arterial roadway on the <br />future roadway thoroughfare plan map, this segment of US 1 is a four -lane paved road with <br />approximately 106 feet of public road right-of-way. No expansion of this portion of US 1 is <br />currently programmed. <br />The site is bounded on the north by 87' Street (Bridge Boulevard), a two-lane paved local road with <br />approximately 60 feet of public road right-of-way. The eastern boundary of the subject property is <br />the 48" Avenue (Oleander Avenue) right-of-way. Although its public road right-of-way is 50 feet <br />wide, this portion of 48`h Avenue has not been constructed. <br />There are many similarities and some differences between the existing CL zoning district and the <br />proposed CG district. The CL district is intended to serve, and be more compatible with, nearby <br />residential development. Therefore, in terms of permitted uses, the CL district is generally more <br />restrictive. In contrast, the CG district allows somewhat more intense commercial development. <br />The differences between the districts are best illustrated by their purpose statements. These purpose <br />statements are as follows: <br />• CL, Limited Commercial District. The CL, limited commercial district, is intended to <br />provide areas for the development of restricted commercial activities. The CL district is <br />intended to accommodate the convenience retail and service needs of area residents, while <br />minimizing the impact of such activities on any nearby residential areas. <br />• CG, General Commercial District. The CG, general commercial district, is intended to <br />provide areas for the development of general retail sales and selected service activities. The <br />CG district is not intended to provide for heavy commercial activities, such as commercial <br />service uses, heavy repair services nor industrial uses. <br />In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the rezoning request will be presented. <br />Specifically, this section will include: <br />• an analysis of the request's impact on public facilities; <br />• an analysis of the request's consistency with the county's comprehensive plan; <br />• an analysis of the request's compatibility with the surrounding area; and <br />• an analysis of the request's potential impact on environmental quality. <br />This site is located within the county Urban Service Area, an area deemed suited for urban scale <br />development. The comprehensive plan establishes standards for: Transportation, Potable Water, <br />Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage, and Recreation. The adequate provision of these services is <br />necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. The comprehensive <br />plan also requires that new development be reviewed to ensure that the minimum acceptable <br />standards for these services and facilities are maintained. <br />September 22, 1998 <br />0 <br />28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.