Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Since the subject properties are within the county's urban -service area, the Comprehensive Plan <br />provides for extension of sanitary sewer lines to the area sometime in the future. As indicated in the <br />discussion above, existing Comprehensive Plan policies will require extension of wastewater <br />collection lines to this area prior to construction of any project other than a de -minimus use. For that <br />reason staff feels that objection C has been adequately addressed. <br />Based on the above analysis and the fact that the county has initiated a Comprehensive Plan text <br />amendment to set density/intensity standards for the C/I land use designation, it is staff's position <br />that this report addresses DCA's ORC Report objections and provides justification for the DCA to <br />find the proposed amendment "in compliance" with state -law. <br />This site is located within the county Urban Service Area, an area deemed suited for urban scale <br />development. The Comprehensive Plan establishes minimum development standards for: <br />Transportation, Potable Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage and Recreation (Future Land Use <br />Policy 3.1). The adequate provision of these services is necessary to ensure the continued quality <br />of life enjoyed by the community. The Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations <br />(LDRs) require that new development be reviewed to ensure that the minimum acceptable standards <br />for these services and facilities are maintained. <br />Policy 3.2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no development shall be approved unless it <br />is consistent with the concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements <br />Element. For Comprehensive Plan amendment requests, conditional concurrency review is required. <br />Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of each facility with respect to a <br />proposed project. Since Comprehensive Plan amendment requests are not projects, county <br />regulations call for the concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the subject <br />property based upon the requested zoning. For commercial/industrial Comprehensive Plan <br />amendment requests, the most intense use (according to the county's Land Development <br />Regulations) is retail commercial with 10,000 square feet of gross floor area per acre of land <br />proposed for redesignation. <br />The site information used for the concurrency analysis is as follows: <br />1. Size of Area to be Redesignated: f7.07 acres <br />2. Existing Land Use Designation: _ L-2, Low -Density Residential - 2 (up to 6 <br />units/acre) <br />3. Proposed Land Use Designation: <br />4. Most Intense Use of Subject Property <br />under Current Land Use Designation: <br />5. Most Intense Use of Subject Property <br />under Proposed Land Use Designation: <br />Transportation <br />C/I, Commercial/Industrial <br />42 Single -Family Units <br />70,700 sq. Ft. of Retail Commercial (Shopping <br />Center in the 5`" Edition ITE Manual). <br />A review of the traffic impacts that would result from the development of the properties indicate that <br />the existing level of service "D" or better on U.S. 1 and other impacted roads would not be lowered. <br />The site information used for determining traffic impacts is shown in table 1. <br />September 22, 1998 <br />63 <br />BOOK 10"i FACE 1"'30 <br />