My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/6/1998
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1998
>
11/6/1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:59 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 11:24:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/06/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK 107 PAGE 490 <br />constructed in other areas of the state, they have the ability to use the sales tax generated at <br />that site which can be used for future improvements to the facility. There is no provision in <br />the law which covers the conditions pertinent to this proposal. Changes in both existing state <br />laws might be obtained through the assistance of our legislative delegation. If changed, the <br />County would have greater flexibility in the funding of the property acquisition. Obviously, <br />there are numerous economic issues that need to be examined and addressed. City and <br />County staff feel that they have the combined ability to pursue negotiations with the Dodgers <br />and the Fox group. A long-term lease arrangement would be most definitely be looked at if <br />the City/County are to pursue the concept with them. <br />Manager Taylor proposed that the City use the City's Asset Management Trust, a fund <br />established many years ago. The proceeds of property the City sold were put into that trust, <br />and when the City purchased property, those funds were used. The trust has nearly <br />sufficient funds to cover the proposal for the City's share of the Dodger property purchase. <br />It presently contains about $1.2 million. <br />Administrator Chandler responded to a comment from Mayor Pease concerning a need <br />for a referendum by assuring everyone that the staff plan on behalf of the County would not <br />impact the local taxpayers inasmuch as the V2 cent sales tax is already an existing revenue <br />source. The major debt service it is funding will be defeased and a new issue put into its <br />place. He assured further that staff had looked at this and has definite limits in mind over <br />which they could not comfortably recommend. <br />It seemed to Vice Chairman Macht that only the word "acquire" separated them from <br />doing this without a burden to the taxpayers and a referendum. He pointed out that this word <br />had been omitted from the State's tourist tax law, which he felt was an oversight and is <br />repairable. If that is possible, then the funding mechanism would be intact and would come <br />from the pockets of our visitors. He felt they should vigorously proceed with getting the law <br />modified to include "acquire". <br />Manager Taylor pointed out that Indian River County presently levies 3 cents tourist <br />development tax, as compared to Brevard and St. Lucie Counties which are at 4 cents. He <br />had spoken with Representative Sembler who has a genuine interest in helping Indian River <br />County retain the Dodgers. <br />There will be a legislative delegation meeting locally on November 23, 1998, and <br />Administrator Chandler pointed out that a letter in the backup had been drafted which could <br />be presented to the delegation at that meeting should the proposal be approved today. <br />November 6, 1998 <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.