11/10/1998 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• The following matrix summarizes which of the above criteria are met by each proposed amendment. PROPOSED AMENDMENT MISTAKE OVERSIGHT CHANGE IN CIRCUMSTANCES FLUE Policy 1.6 X FLUE Policy 1.12 X FLUE Policy 1.14 X FLUE Page 61 & Policy 1.16 X FLUE Policy 1.22 X FLUE Policy 1.23 X FLUE Policy 1.26 X FLUE Policy 1.28 X FLUE Policy 1.29 X New FLUE Policy 1.39 X New FLUE Policy 1.40 X New FLUE Policy 1.41 & Table 2.13 X New FLUE Policy 14.5 X ICE Page 19 X ICE Policy 3.9 X FLUE - Future Land Use Element ICE - Intergovernmental Coordination Element These changes are relatively minor. They add clarity to the policies and address issues (such as the land use designation of spoil islands in the Indian River Lagoon and land use designation swaps) that, due to oversights, were not addressed in the original plan. Because they correct oversights in the comprehensive plan, the proposed amendments are consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3. Although required by state law, land use intensity standards for the Commercial/Industrial, Public Facilities, and Recreation land use designations were not specifically included in the comprehensive plan. Although the plan was amended numerous times, neither the county nor the state reviewing agency (the Department of Community Affairs) noticed this situation until recently. The omission from the comprehensive plan of land use intensity standards for commercial/industrial land use designations constitutes an oversight. By adding land use intensity standards for the Commercial/ Industrial, Public Facilities, and Recreation land use designations to the comprehensive plan, the proposed amendment corrects that oversight. For that reason, the proposed amendment is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3. November 10, 1998 45 CJ BOOK 1J e PAGE'-