Laserfiche WebLink
BOOK 107 PACE 547 <br />The proposed amendment sets specific criteria for node expansions where the subject node is less <br />than 70% developed and involving the following: <br />• land use designation swaps involving more than one node; and <br />• corrections of mistakes or oversights affecting residentially designated property. <br />Although such node expansions have occurred in the past, setting specific criteria clarifies the policy <br />and decreases the chances of misapplication of the policy. <br />Specifically, the proposed amendment ensures that land use designation swaps involving more than <br />one node will not increase potential impacts on any public facilities, and that such a swap will not <br />increase the overall land use density or intensity depicted on the future land use map. The proposed <br />amendment also limits node expansions that correct an oversight or a mistake to ten acre sites. <br />Future Land Use Element Policy 1.23 sets a minimum separation distance of 1.5 miles between <br />commercial/industrial nodes. The proposed amendment rewords the policy to clarify the intent of <br />the policy. <br />The proposed amendment recognizes that development within Neighborhood Commercial Nodes <br />either has not occurred or has not been truly neighborhood oriented. The county, however, has <br />provided for TND Projects that incorporate neighborhood commercial uses as part of the project. <br />Such TND Projects may prove to be a viable alternative to new or expanded Neighborhood <br />Commercial Nodes. <br />Rather than going through the entire rezoning process to totally eliminate Neighborhood Commercial <br />Nodes, the proposed amendment allows the seven existing Neighborhood Commercial Nodes to <br />continue in their current configuration. The creation of new Neighborhood Commercial Nodes or <br />the expansion of exiting ones, however, is prohibited by the proposed amendment. Keeping the <br />existing Neighborhood Commercial Nodes also protects the private property rights of the owners <br />of land within those nodes. <br />Although the county and the school board coordinate in an informal manner regarding many of the <br />issues covered in these policies, the proposed amendment requires greater formal coordination. The <br />purpose of the amendments is to encourage the location of schools, parks, libraries and community <br />centers in near residential areas. Locating community facilities near residences efficiently uses <br />county resources, discourages urban sprawl, reduces automobile trips, and allows children to walk <br />to many destinations (e.g. schools, libraries and parks). <br />These changes specifically recognize that not every zoning district allowed in a land use designation <br />is appropriate for every site within that land use designation. Table 2.13 specifically identifies which <br />November 10, 1998 <br />48 <br />40 0 <br />