My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/17/1998
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1998
>
11/17/1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:59 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 11:27:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/17/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK 10'/ FAGE 671 <br />addressed by ordinance. Yet that is exactly what happen, as the minutes make dear. A copy of <br />the miantes are attached for your review as Exhibit B. <br />flunilY sAt the public on the approval of the plat, the residents of Colonial Terrace, a single. <br />n, objected to the platting of Colonial $eights for muhi�'amily use. The Colonial <br />Terrace residents felt that their drinking water might be adversely unp�ed by �_ <br />development on a septic system is Colonial Heights. iivaily <br />While that concern was invalid at the time, because your ordinances addressed it at the time, <br />It is even more inappropruft thy_ I enclose as Exhibit C. a sketch which shows Colonial Heights <br />Subdivision and also Colonial Terrace immediately to the West Your staff will confirm that every <br />Colonial Terrace residence adjacent to Colonial Fleiglrts is connected to and currently rently using coin, <br />water. Further, the Colonial Terrace residents themselves are on a septic system. It is luthedicrous to <br />think that a septic system in Colonial liaghts would affect the dr� water <br />Colonial <br />Terrace homes, which am on the county water system, when the Colonial Terrace homes themselves <br />arc on a septic system. Thar own septic systems are much doser to their <br />Of Colonial Heights could ever be.drinl[ing water than <br />those <br />Sybil Investments Partnership, Ltd., is the enterprise of the Heran family, which has worked <br />diligently over the last 9 years to improve its other holdings in Colonial Heights. One Heran family <br />metriber, Dean, lives directly across the sorest from the subject lots. The He= family phuts to build <br />11611 9uafty, 3 bedroom 2 bath homes m a triplex attangemeat on the subject lots, Most of the lots <br />are in excess of 200 feet deep. The current zoning, RM61 pen this type of construction, and a <br />site plan has already leen submitted for approvaL The processing of the site plan is being held up <br />Pending this board's revocation of the plat restriction. A copy of the preliminary site plan is <br />attached for your review as Exhibit D. <br />Please note that Colonial Terrace and Colonial Heights will have sbetignificant <br />as long as the plat restriction is lifted. That is because the County ordinances require <br />an but they iv notrequire buffer between �-�Y development and g°BI'-�Y development, <br />to develop �8 between 2 singe -fan* subdivisions. In fact, if these lots were <br />already�°Y restidences, the developer could strip them of the vegetation which is <br />CM the PmPefty, leaving no buffer Further, there is a tight of way betwem Colonial Heights <br />and Colonial Terrace which was created, I believe, by the old drainage district At a nm,, this <br />right of way is 15 fink and may be as much as 30 feet. This provides a distance <br />the 2 tons+ and that any fears Colonial Terrace residents may <br />h� j�ed, <br />Finally, Colonial Heights ants between dee single_flunfly Colonial Terrace Subdivision to the <br />west and commercially zoned property on Old Dixie E%hway to the east As a multi <br />subdivision, Colonial Heights Subdivision acts as a buffer between the single-family project and the <br />commWciaVmdgh*`aY Property to the east. This makes planning sense, as to <br />Heigbts is allowed to develop as a multi- long as Colonial <br />20 to single -Y, when Proj It makes no sense to restrict lots 14 through <br />would single -fa �Y have sat unused for 17 <br />Years, because no reasonable <br />person <br />goods � ���y lot � �-family units is a muni -family Prof The lots are "damaged <br />Pnfec dy suited for multi -family development <br />We urge the Board of County Commissioners to schedule this matter for a resolution to <br />revoke the resumer August restriction <br />th that is n�opment of this property in accordance with the RM -6 zoning <br />Possible, Please schedule it after September 5th. <br />BRUCE BARIETT <br />For Sybil Investment PartIIership Ltd <br />/mjw <br />Enclosures <br />cc: Robert M Keating, AICP <br />Charles Vnimac, County Attorney <br />NOVEMBER 17, 1998 <br />0 <br />-56- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.