My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/16/1999
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1999
>
3/16/1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:11:55 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 12:26:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/16/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br />IBOOK 103 PAGE 79 <br />AL==TnZ9 AND ANALYSIS <br />Since no other existing County nor School District property with <br />proper land use classification exists, staff must secure a site to <br />proceed. The following alternatives are presented: <br />Alternative No. 1 <br />Approve execution of the Option Agreement. The School <br />District will purchase 15-20 acres of this site and the <br />County will purchase 5-10 acres. The exact amounts have <br />yet to be determined. <br />Alternative No. 2 <br />Deny approval and proceed to look for other <br />sites. <br />RSCOMIMMATIONS AND FONDINO <br />Staff recommends Alternative No. l.whereby the Option Agreement is <br />approved. Funding to be by School District and County (Local <br />Option Sales Tax). <br />Commissioner Ginn felt that $10,000 for an option seems excessive for this parcel. <br />Brian Heady was recognized by the Chair and commented that he had several points <br />to raise before the County goes forward with this purchase. He believed that the School <br />Board took action based on incorrect information that the Board of County Commissioners <br />had already taken action on this matter. <br />Commissioner Ginn questioned how that could be corrected, and County Attorney <br />Vitunac responded that the Board could make any action conditional on the School Board's <br />action. <br />Mr. Heady then commented on a DEP report stating that the landfill is causing <br />groundwater contamination on acreage south of Gifford Road. He believed that no one had <br />ever notified the residents in that area of the groundwater contamination. He also noted that <br />the DEP had directed the owner of the landfill to take action to abate the problem. <br />County Administrator Chandler responded that the County has been working on this <br />problem for 5 or 6 years and has spent several hundred thousand dollars on the situation. <br />The residential areas were notified and County water was extended to those residences. The <br />landfill goes back to the 1960s and 1970s and the problems have been very publicly <br />addressed for many years. <br />Utilities Director Don Hubbs advised that this program has been ongoing for a number <br />of years. Staff will be reviewing the process soon and will bring the matter back to the <br />Board shortly thereafter. <br />MARCH 16, 1999 <br />-94- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.