Laserfiche WebLink
BOOK 103 SAGE <br />As publicly owned sites containing estuarine wetlands and native upland habitat, each of the subject <br />properties meets those criteria. For those reasons, the request is consistent with Future Land Use <br />Element Policies 1.5 and 1.6. <br />As part of the staff analysis, all policies in the comprehensive plan were considered. Based upon <br />that analysis, staff determined that the proposed land use designation amendment is consistent with <br />the comprehensive plan. <br />The sites' existing land use designations offer only limited environmental protections. Residential <br />development on the subject properties would be required to preserve only 15 percent of the upland <br />habitat of the sites. In contrast, under the proposed land use designation, the entire area of each site <br />would be preserved, and development would be limited to conservation and compatible passive <br />recreational uses. <br />Although the sites are publicly owned and could be developed as public parks under the existing land <br />use designations, the proposed land use designation provides the sites with additional protection <br />from development. By prohibiting most types of development on the sites, the proposed request will <br />ensure that the environmental quality of the sites will be preserved. <br />For these reasons, the proposed land use amendment is anticipated to positively impact the <br />environmental quality of the subject properties. <br />As noted in the Description and Conditions section of this staff report, state law requires that the <br />Board of County Commissioners hold two public hearings prior to approving county initiated <br />rezonings of more than ten acres. Although normally applied to ensure public participation when <br />the county initiates the rezoning of privately owned land, this requirement also applies to county <br />initiated rezonings of publicly owned land. <br />Because it meets the criteria set in state law, the portion of this request that would rezone Subject <br />Properties 2 and 3 requires two public hearings. The March 16, 1999 Board of County <br />Commissioners meeting will meet state requirements for one of the public hearings. The second <br />public hearing then must be held at least 10 days after the first hearing. Additionally, state law <br />requires that at lust one of the public hearings be held after 5:00 p.m. on a weekday, unless four <br />commissioners vote to conduct that hearing at another time of day. <br />In this case, several factors indicate that holding the second rezoning public hearing at 9:05 am. at <br />a regular Board of County Commissioners meeting would be sufficient to ensure public <br />participation. Those factors include the following: <br />• Although the state requirement for two public hearings is normally intended for rezonings <br />of privately owned land, the subject properties in this case are publicly owned; and <br />• The firture use of these properties already have been discussed at numerous public hearings <br />and public meetings, including Land Acquisition Advisory Committee meetings and other <br />meetings regarding the subject land use amendment and rezoning requests. <br />For those reasons, staff feels that it would be appropriate to hold the second rezoning public hearing <br />at 9:05 am. on April 6, 1999. That is the first Board of County Commissioners meeting that meets <br />the state requirement of at least 10 days between the first and second hearings. <br />Based on the analysis, staff has determined that the proposed amendment is consistent with the <br />comprehensive plan, compatible with all surrounding land uses, and will cause no adverse impacts <br />on the provision of public services. The proposed changes work to ensure the preservation of <br />environmentally sensitive and important habitat. For these reasons, staff supports the request. <br />Based on the analysis, staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the Board <br />of County Commissioners take the follow actions: <br />1) Approve the request to redesignate Subject Properties 1, 2, and 3 to C-1; <br />2) Approve the request to rezone Subject Property 1 to Con -1; and <br />3) Schedule the second rezoning public hearing for Subject Properties 2 and 3 for 9:05 am., at <br />the regular commission meeting of April 6, 1999. <br />MARCH 16, 1999 <br />-32- <br />