4/6/1999 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I n BOOK 103 ° PAGE ;J Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the $114,434.86 purchase, and authorize the Chairman to execute the contract. Funding will be from Account #315-214-541-066.12. ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously approved the contract with Abraham BarkeM Jr. and Charlotte Barkett in the amount of $114,434.86 and authorized the Chairman to execute same, as recommended by staff. CONTRACT IS ON FILE WITH THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 11.G.2. CITY OF VERO BEACH/INDIAN RIVER COUNTY TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT - PROPOSED AMENDMENTS The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 22, 1999: aaaaamaana maaaamaamaamaaaaaaaamaaaoaaaaamanan TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator TBRU: James W. Davis, P.E. Public Works Director FROM: Christopher R. Mora, P.E. County Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: Proposed Amendments to City of Vero Beach / Indian River County Traffic Signal Maintenance Agreement DATE: March 22, 1999 aaaaaaaaaaaamaaaaaaaaaaaaanaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaanammaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS Under an interlocal agreement executed in 1992, the County operates and maintains twenty-nine (29) of the thirty-six (36) traffic signals within the City of Vero Beach. The City has now requested that the remaining seven traffic signals be formally added to the maintenance agreement. These seven traffic signals were not included within the original agreement because: 1. They were built and activated after 1992, or 2. They were not part of the original Closed Loop computerized traffic signal system. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS For purposes of operation, maintenance, and coordination, the County has found it advantageous that all traffic signals within the County remain under the jurisdiction of a single agency. The alternatives are as follows: APRIL 69 1999 Ka 0