Laserfiche WebLink
The Planning and Zoning Commission and the Professional Services Advisory Committee have <br />considered all of the amendments listed above, and have made recommendations to the Board of <br />County Commissioners. Those recommendations are noted for each proposed amendment in the <br />analysis section of this report. <br />The Board of County Commissioners is now to consider each amendment and is to direct staff to <br />make any desired changes to the amendments. In response to Board direction and to any form and <br />sufficiency comments from the County Attorney's Office, staff will prepare a revised, "final" <br />ordinance document for the Board to consider at its May 4, 1999 meeting. <br />Each LDR amendment is contained in the proposed ordinance. The following sections contain an <br />analysis of each amendment. <br />1. Murphy Deed Reservations <br />■ Background on Murphy Deed Reservations <br />In the 1930's, large acreages of land were vested in the State of "Florida due to unpaid taxes. <br />Subsequently, the State, when it issued deeds back to private owners, reserved unto itself 100' of <br />right-of-way on each side of the center line of any abutting state road that was in existence as of the <br />date of the deed. The State's practice of reserving these rights-of-way was based upon the 1937 <br />Murphy Act. Such reservations are known as Murphy Deed Reservations. <br />During the 1930's, 40's, 50's, and 60's, when the State issued deeds with the reservations, there were <br />a number of roads under state jurisdiction. Many roads that were State roads in the past, and for <br />which Murphy Deed Reservations were established, are now county roads. Such roads include 2r, <br />43rd, 901 Avenue, Oslo Road, and many others. Although these are now county roads, there are <br />Murphy Deed Reservations over some of the properties that abut these roads. <br />It should be noted that, even along county roads, the State alone has the authority to release Murphy <br />Deed Reservation area. The release request process involves formal application with the State. The <br />State seeks county public works staff input for any release adjacent to a county road. It has been the <br />State's practice to release reservation area along county roads, if the county supports such a release. <br />Thus, the county has significant influence regarding such release requests. <br />Over the last few years, the county has sought to research, identify, and assert its Murphy Deed <br />Reservation rights. For site plan projects affected by Murphy Deed Reservation areas, such areas <br />have been treated as rights-of-way, and setbacks have been applied and measured from the <br />reservation line. When reviewing a reservation release request, the county's policy is to retain only <br />reservation area needed to meet right-of-way standards. Thus, in making reservation release <br />decisions the county equates reservation area -with right-of-way area. On September 1, 1998, the <br />Board of County Commissioners affirmed the policy of treating reservation area the same as right-of- <br />way area for setback purposes, and directed staff to amend the LDRs to reflect this policy. <br />■ Proposed Amendments <br />As a result of the September 1998 decision of the Board of County Commissioners, four existing <br />LDR definitions are proposed to be amended. These definition changes will codify the Board's <br />stated policy of treating Murphy Deed Reservation areas the same as road right-of-way. One <br />implication of that policy is that building setbacks are now measured from reservation lines, the same <br />as measuring setbacks from right-of-way or property lines. <br />April 19,1999 <br />3 <br />BOOK i0' PAIGE n5 <br />