My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/27/1999
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1999
>
4/27/1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:11:56 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 12:33:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/27/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK DO FAGE -J.1 <br />Each Board member was asked to review the palate and be prepared to make a recommendation <br />at that meeting. Upon your recommendation, we should be able to move forward. and finalize <br />the painting project. <br />ANALYSIS: <br />As a matter of advice, staff still feels a single color is the best alternative given the different <br />elements of construction making up this building. However if the Board feels that it would <br />prefer a diversity on the painting, staff would suggest authorizing General Services to coordinate <br />with the painter in making final decisions provided such optional painting stays within the <br />original budget as approved. <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Staff recommends that a single color be used, or that under the circumstances if the Board wants <br />some color diversity, that General Services be given the flexibility to coordinate with the painter <br />those colors selected by the Board so that the cost remains within the original bid price <br />submitted by Lucas Painting. <br />Director Frame advised that from the informal survey conducted the #2 palate seemed <br />to be the top choice as well as off-white. He pointed out the importance of staying within <br />the bid amount of $36,000 in the process. He recommended going with a single color. <br />Following discussion, Commissioner Adams stated her preference for off-white and <br />Commissioner Grin commented she likes color and definition. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED BY <br />Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously directed <br />Director Frame to work with the architect to come up with a <br />suitable plan within the bid amount. <br />Commissioner Adams reminded the Commissioners they were giving up the right to <br />criticize. <br />1 LF. 1. HEALTH INSURANCE CONSULTANT CONTRACT - THE <br />GEHRING GROUP. INC. (RFP 9052) <br />The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 21, 1999: <br />APRIL 27, 1999 <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.