My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/4/1999
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1999
>
5/4/1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:11:56 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 12:34:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/04/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Jeff Meade, 1932 Tamara Trail, a marine contractor, stated that state regulations do <br />differentiate between piers and docks and piers cannot be used for boat mooring. He has <br />never seen a boat used at one of these structures and Mr. Fisher only wants to fish, observe <br />the wildlife, and enjoy the beauty of the river. He believed that not allowing such piers <br />would be discriminating against someone who is trying to do the right thing. He believes <br />very strongly in protecting the environment and Pelican Island Refuge. <br />George Kulzicki, 155 McKee Lane, asked how the county will'address future <br />projects. <br />Community Development Director Bob Keating stated that dock permits have been <br />issued in the past when the state has considered the structure to be a pier. The Development <br />Order of Grand Harbor prohibits these structures and the current pier definition states that <br />these are only structures to be used by the public. <br />After further discussion, Commissioner Adams believed that rather than just <br />redefining the definition of "piers", this action would effectively allow a practice that has not <br />previously been allowed. <br />Commissioner Ginn felt the item should be sent back to staff for revision and <br />additional definitions. <br />CONSENSUS WAS REACHED TO SEND THE ITEM BACK TO STAFF FOR <br />REVISION. <br />After determining that no one else wished to be heard with regard to this item, the <br />Chairman closed the public hearing. <br />The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in <br />regard to Item #5, Height of Buildings: Multiple Roof Structures and Roof Peaks. <br />Stephen Bischoff, 985 Reef Road, believed the eave should be used as the 35 foot <br />maximum, with a 15 -foot rise in pitch based on the crown of the road. <br />Director Boling responded that the starting point will be at the natural or required <br />elevation. The definition starts with "average natural grade". <br />MAY 49 1999 <br />• <br />DO <br />-31- BOOK � Pr�U`E i73 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.