My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/11/1999
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1999
>
5/11/1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:11:56 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 12:36:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/11/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />0 <br />Besides modifying the value of variables in the model, the amendment also modifies the cost <br />component of the traffic impact fee formula. Based upon detailed analysis of roadway project costs, <br />the cost per lane mile for construction of roads in the county was estimated to be approximately <br />$837,860. This amount is significantly higher than the cost per lane mile being applied to benefit <br />districts in the west part of the county. <br />Because of the detailed analysis, the updated lane mile cost is more defensible than the current nine <br />cost estimates. One advantage of the new cost estimate is that it applies countywide, thereby <br />allowing a single traffic impact fee to be assessed in all three of the new benefit districts. That not <br />only makes fee administration easier, it also ensures that fees will be assessed equitably countywide. <br />The revised cost estimate, however, is the principal reason why fees will be significantly increased <br />in the west part of the county with adoption of the amendment. <br />As with the current traffic impact fee rate schedule, the proposed rate schedule reflects a 15 percent <br />discount. Although this discount reduces the degree to which new development pays its way, there <br />are several advantages associated with the discount. First, it reduces the traffic impact fee rate <br />assessed to new projects, making the fee more acceptable. Second, it compensates for any errors <br />associated with overassessment, thereby making the fee more justifiable. Finally, it limits challenges <br />to the ordinance, because the absolute rates are discounted. <br />Although traffic impact fees will increase in the area covered by several of the existing benefit <br />districts, those increases are needed to correct current inequities. Adoption of the amendment will <br />ensure that the fees paid are equitable geographically as well as among different use categories. <br />Consequently, the proposed amendment will provide more fairness to feepayers, make <br />implementation more efficient, and allow improvements to be completed in a more timely manner. <br />Impact on Housing Costs <br />Whenever amendments to the county's LDR's are considered, policy 1.7 of the Housing Element <br />of the County's Comprehensive Plan requires that a financial statement be prepared to assess the <br />anticipated impact of the regulation changes on housing cost. Policy 1.7 is stated below. <br />"Policy 1.7: As part of the adoption process for any county regulation which could affect <br />housing development, county planning staff shall prepare a Financial Impact Statement to <br />assess the anticipated impact of the proposed regulation on the cost of housing. When <br />proposed regulatory activities are anticipated to increase the estimated cost per unit for the <br />development of housing, the Financial Impact Statement shall include an estimated increased <br />cost per unit projection. The financial impact statement then will be reviewed by the <br />Professional Services Advisory Committee, the Planning and Zoning Commission, and, if <br />possible, the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee. Those groups shall consider the <br />regulation's effect on housing cost in making their recommendation to the Board of County <br />Commissioners. The Board of County Commissioners will consider the financial impact <br />statement in making its final decision on the adoption of any proposed regulations." <br />Following is the financial impact statement for revisions to Chapter 953 of the Land Development <br />Regulations (LDR)s. Proposed revisions to Chapter 953 of the county's LDRs will increase the <br />impact fee rate for most of the existing traffic impact fee benefit districts (please see the attachment <br />1 for the districts location). The following table compares the existing and proposed traffic impact <br />fee rates for single-family and multi -family housing units and displays the amount and percentage <br />of increase in each district. <br />TABLE 2. .SINGIN IRA MU V nWVT T n►Tn TMrnnc. <br />DISTRICT <br />I <br />II <br />III <br />IV <br />V <br />VI <br />VII <br />VIII <br />IX <br />Single -Family existing <br />TIF <br />$1,450 <br />$1,355 <br />$1,113 <br />$1,000 <br />$1,513 <br />$1,211 <br />$587 <br />$860 <br />$1,110 <br />Single -Family proposed <br />TIF <br />$1523 <br />$1523 <br />$1523 <br />$1,523 <br />$1.523 <br />$1523 <br />$1.523 <br />$1,523 <br />$1,523 <br />Dollar mount difference <br />for a SF housing unit <br />+$73 <br />+$168 <br />+$410 <br />+$523 <br />+$10 <br />+$312 <br />+$936 J+$663 <br />+$413 <br />Percentage change <br />5.03% <br />12.39% <br />36.83%' <br />52.30% <br />0.66% <br />25.76% <br />159.45% <br />77.09% <br />37.20% <br />Proposed TIF rate as <br />Percentage of old rate for <br />105.03% <br />112.39% <br />136.83% <br />152.30% <br />100.66% <br />125.76%=177 <br />MAY 119 1999 <br />31 <br />BOOK fAGc; °'3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.