My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/18/1999
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1999
>
5/18/1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:11:56 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 12:37:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/18/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />lam', e� r <br />BOOK � � � F'AGt o <br />Based on a review of the comprehensive plan, staff has identified text errors in policy 5.1 of the <br />Coastal Management Element and in policy 7.3 of the Recreation and Open Space Element. Part <br />of the purpose of this amendment request is to correct those errors. <br />At the November 24, 1998 Economic Development Council (EDC) meeting, a decision was made <br />by the EDC to review the policies of the Economic Development Element to determine if those <br />existing policies are producing the intended results. An EDC workshop was scheduled for January <br />12, 1999 to perform that review. <br />At the January 12 workshop, the EDC discussed each of the Economic Development Element <br />Policies. and assessed whether completion of the actions called for in each policy would produce the <br />results needed to meet the objectives of the Economic Development Element. Based on the <br />workshop, the EDC directed staff to revise three policies and delete one policy. In addition, the EDC <br />decided that another workshop would be held on February 16, 1999, to complete its review of the <br />Economic Development Element's policies. <br />Based on discussions at that January 12 workshop, Planning staff and the Chamber of Commerce <br />staff met to review each policy of the Economic Development Element. In reviewing the policies, <br />staff assessed the type of action that was called for in each policy and determined if that action could <br />be defined and if that action could be completed. Consequently, staff recommended that nineteen <br />policies be revised and another nineteen policies be deleted. <br />On February 16, 1999, the EDC reviewed and approved the proposed changes to the Economic <br />Development Element policies and voted 9-0 to recommend that staff proceed with a county initiated <br />comprehensive plan text amendment to incorporate the proposed changes. <br />Based on a review of the Future Land Use Element, staff has identified two policies that should be <br />revised. Policy 14.3 is being revised to correct an error in the text. Policy 6.1 is being revised to <br />indicate that public services and/or facilities may be expanded into agriculturally designated lands <br />to serve traditional neighborhood design projects and mixed use districts. <br />On March 8, 1999, at an advertised public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 7 <br />to 0 to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners transmit the proposed text amendment, <br />with the exception of policy 5.5 of the Future Land Use Element, to the State Department of <br />Community Affairs (DCA) for their review. <br />Proposed changes to policy 5.5 of the Future Land Use Element were presented by staff to the <br />Planning and Zoning Commission at that March 8 public hearing. Staff proposed reducing the level <br />of commercial development permitted in a residential planned development (PD) from 10% of the <br />total project area to 3% of the total project area The Planning and Zoning Commission concluded <br />that more information was needed regarding commercial uses in a PD. Staff was directed by the <br />Planning and Zoning Commission to research the issue and resubmit the proposed change in the July <br />comprehensive plan amendment window. <br />Professional Services Advisory Committee <br />On April 29, 1999, the Professional Services Advisory Committee voted 7 to 0 to recommend that <br />the Board of County Commissioners transmit the proposed text amendment, with minor changes, <br />to the State Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for their review. <br />ANA_ i •Y <br />In this section, an analysis of the proposed changes by element will be provided, including a <br />discussion of the consistency of the amendment with the comprehensive plan. <br />For policies being recommended for revision, new text is identified by a double underline, while <br />deleted text is identified by a stleex6 Due to significant changes in many of the policies of the <br />Economic Development Element, the double underline and strikeout method was not used to <br />illustrate recommended changes; instead, revised polices are provided entirely. <br />Policy 5.1 has been revised to correct a citation to the Florida Administration Code (FAC). As <br />shown below, the original policy referred to Department of Community Affairs Rule 9J -5(3)(c)(3). <br />In the revised policy, the citation has been corrected to refer to the rules 9J-5.003(19) and 9J-5.012, <br />F.A.C.. <br />MAY 189 1999 <br />• <br />—24— <br />U <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.