My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/22/1999
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1999
>
6/22/1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2018 11:25:19 AM
Creation date
6/17/2015 12:43:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/22/1999
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Ginn thanked the Utilities Department staff, especially Director Hubbs <br />and Assistant Director Smith, and Mr. Rocca and Hartman & Associates for the very fine <br />effort. She also thanked the Utilities Advisory Committee members who challenged Mr. <br />Rocca every step of the way on cost allocations; she thought the result was much better <br />because of their involvement. There is now a model in place and the goal is to eliminate as <br />much as possible the base facility charge and to have volume charges more reflective of <br />actual usage, but that is not possible at this time. She felt this was the very best rate study <br />the County could have. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Ginn, and <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, to approve staff's <br />recommendation (Option 1). <br />Commissioner Ginn asked the Commissioners if they wished to change "capacity <br />charge" back to "impact fee", and Commissioner Tippin thought it should remain as <br />proposed. <br />Commissioner Stanbridge remarked onthe excellentpresentationbyHartman and that <br />the GIS in the department has made the overhead cost almost non-existent. <br />Vice Chairman Adams commended Commissioner Ginn and the committee for years <br />of hard work. The committee members have put in a lot of time with staff and it was <br />appreciated. <br />Vice Chairman. Adams was still concerned with the department's policy on cut-offs <br />when there are existing deposits and felt that needed to be fixed. <br />Commissioner Ginn agreed that it definitely needed to be given consideration. <br />Director Hubbs pledged that a minimum threshold of $10 would be appropriate (now <br />$5) and thought it could be done administratively. <br />Vice Chairman Adams asked if it could be increased to $20-$25 if the customer had <br />a $50 deposit, and Director Hubbs responded in the affirmative. <br />Commissioner Ginn pointed out that committee member, Mr. Adam Kubik, had <br />worked as a rate consultant for many years in New York. <br />JUNE 229 1999 <br />31 <br />BOOK 109 PAGE 5-a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.