Laserfiche WebLink
FF- <br />• <br />BOOK iOi PAGES03 <br />b. Construct or bond -out off-site sidewalks (9* Street SW and 51h Street SW) <br />that are required for that project phase or village. <br />C. Construct any off-site roadway improvements required for that phase or <br />village, in accordance with an approved developer's agreement. <br />d. Construct any off-site utility improvements required for that project phase or <br />village, in accordance with an approved Utility Services developer's <br />agreement. <br />1. Application <br />2. Location Map <br />3. Conceptual PD Plan <br />4. Accessory Commercial Criteria <br />5. Buffer Graphics (colorized graphic by applicant); separate <br />6. Draft of Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes <br />7. Rezoning Ordinance <br />8. Colorized Multi -Family Building Elevation; separate <br />Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed the memo using a locationmap (page 94) and <br />conceptual plan (page 95) displayed on the ELMO, described the requested conceptual PD <br />plan in detail as in the above memorandum. <br />The Commissioners had many questions and comments concerning the conceptual <br />plan indicating their concerns about open green space, stormwater management, maintenance <br />of the stormwater tracts, buffering, boundary units abutting to existing home sites, turn lanes, <br />impact on traffic, setting precedent, cutbacks, sizes and quantities of the multi -family units, <br />as well as other concerns. <br />Chairman Macht had a concern that this development would look like Viera. <br />The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in <br />this matter. <br />Sherry Jones, 5766 9' Street S.W., who owns and lives in a home which neighbors <br />an area of planned 2 -story triplexes, spoke in opposition to the multi -family units in the <br />conceptual plan which would be located near her property. She requested, at a minimum, <br />that Citrus Springs continue the 200' water management buffer in addition to the G berm <br />along the east side of her 2 acre lot instead of placing 4 triplexes there. <br />-_ Ellen Arnsmeier, 5768 9' Street S.W., who is also a close neighbor of the area west <br />of the planned 2 -story triplexes, spoke in opposition to the conceptual plan showing the <br />July 13, 1999 <br />56 <br />