Laserfiche WebLink
F, <br />BOOK iUJ PAGE O05 <br />Vice Chairman Adams inquired about phasing of the construction and phasing of <br />perimeter buffering, and Mr. Barkett stated the buffering would go in as each community <br />is developed, that is, the entire perimeter buffering would not be going in along with the first <br />phase of development. <br />There was a discussion as to what could have been permitted on the properly if the <br />conceptual plan was not for a PD, and that the property could be rezoned appropriately to <br />RS -3 if the PD is denied. <br />Chairman Macht expressed concern about the 50' lot sizes which are not allowed in <br />the City of Vero Beach. <br />John Haley of Suntree Partners, 136 Lansing Island Drive, advised for the record <br />there was no relationship with the Viera property in Brevard County. He explained the <br />multi -family units are not intended to be rentals and no family lives above another. He <br />stated that the homeowner documents controlling the entire property will cover the water <br />management system. Their past performance in this matter can be verified with the St. Johns <br />River Water Management District. They are continuing to try to work through this process, <br />describing what they have conceded to already which exceeds the code requirements. They <br />are willing to work with the neighbors and have already increased the buffer. He expressed <br />a willingness to reduce the three-plex buildings down to two plexes or single family attached <br />homes to help minimize the scale of the buildings abutting the neighbors. They understood <br />an additional 10% density could be allowed under the TND, but felt it would not be <br />appropriate for the project. He hoped the Board would approve the request and asked for <br />questions. <br />Commissioner Stanbridge asked if the water retention areas needed to be so large, and <br />Mr. Haley deemed that an engineering question that had not been engineered for the <br />conceptual plan. <br />Vice Chairman Adams asked if the triplexes could not be moved and the "lake" <br />extended in their place, and Mr. Haley indicated the applicant's willingness to make the <br />entire project just single family and duplexes. <br />Chairman Macht inquired if that would become zero -lot -line, and Mr. Haley indicated <br />fiuther willingness to do whatever it takes to get this resolved. Chairman Macht stated that <br />a condition of his approval was the elimination of the concept or category of multi -family <br />and he would accept zero lot line. <br />Discussion ensued on zero lot lines. <br />July 13, 1999 <br />58 <br />0 <br />