My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/27/1999
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1999
>
7/27/1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:11:57 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 12:49:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/27/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
compromise. Although this was not a public hearing, he asked if anyone else wished to <br />speak. <br />Larry Echelberger, 7435 16' Manor, West Lake Estates, was concerned that there <br />would be a right turn lane with a traffic signal at a certain intersection. <br />Director Davis stated that if sufficient traffic warranted the need for a traffic signal <br />in the future, it would be considered. At present, neither the proposal nor the cost estimate <br />include a traffic signal. It was proposed to have a left -turn lane, not a right -tum lane, at that <br />location. There will be southbound thru, southbound left, and northbound thru lanes. <br />Mr. Echelberger contended that it would be difficult to egress West Lake Estates if <br />traffic backed up there, and Director Davis responded that there is over 300 feet of separation <br />there which is adequate and assured him there was plenty of room to stack the traffic. <br />Mr. Echelberger offered several reasons for abandoning the section of 16t` Street. He <br />saw no reason why it should not be abandoned. He claimed this possibility was not <br />discussed at a meeting and the people were told it was "beyond discussion." He asserted that <br />the street does not go through now, and he saw no need for it in the future except to supply <br />traffic to a commercial center on the other side of West Lake Estates. <br />Chairman Macht understood 16' Street eventually would go through to Ud and 901` <br />Streets, and Director Davis responded that was correct. The need for the (east -west) <br />roadway is predicated on numerous issues, one of which was use as a secondary route to the <br />numerous developments for emergency vehicles in case of accident or congestion on SR60. <br />Mr. Echelberger continued to plead his cause citing various reasons. <br />Vice Chairman Adams understood his concerns, but felt the Commissioners would <br />be trading one set ofproblems for others if there were to eliminate that section of 16* Street. <br />She stated the road needed to be kept open not just as an access to Pointe West but also to <br />other points further west. She felt that what has been added to the recommendation has <br />improved the severity of impact on the West Lake Estates homeowners, maybe not for Mr. <br />Echelberger and his neighbor, because their houses happen to be closest to the road. She was <br />unhappy, however, with the proposed wall on the north side and preferred a berm and more <br />intense vegetation which would also provide a sound buffer. She understood there were five <br />other options and wished to see them. <br />Director Davis had those other options available, and Commissioner Ginn wanted to <br />see them also. In discussion, Director Davis pointed out that stormwater treatment consumed <br />JULY 27,1999 <br />83 <br />BOOK 109 PAGE 3.35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.