9/7/1999 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• ANALYSIS At the June 3 workshop there was a consensus that, in the interest of equity and fairness, a pet pig that existed in a residential area prior to the Code clarification should be allowed to stay for the duration of the pig's lifetime (12 to 20 years). However, that allowance should be conditioned upon the pig's owner taking specific actions to minimize nuisance impacts to neighbors. Attendees of the workshop considered the following issues: • Size of the pig (e.g., no larger than 150 lbs.) • Location of the pig (e.g., indoors, outdoors, duration outdoors, setback from property lines) • Visual buffers from neighbors (fences, vegetation) • Sanitary control (concerns of potential odor, flies) Regarding pig size, the consensus at the workshop was that it would be unfair and potentially inhumane to make pig size a condition of whether it could stay. The concern was that there was no size limit prior to the Code clarification, and a weight limit might promote a severe diet or starving of a pig to meet a weight limit, which would be inhumane. Regarding location of where a pig is kept, the consensus was that pigs should be restrained or fenced such that they could not root or roam along neighbor property lines. Also, there should be visual buffers (e.g., privacy fences and/ or heavy vegetation) for the neighbors' sake. There was also discussion that, on lots smaller than %z acre, there would be a particular need for six-foot privacy fencing, whereas such fencing may not be necessary on lots % acre or larger. On the issue of sanitary control, there were different opinions expressed on whether there is a sanitation concern beyond what is normally associated with other pets such as dogs. The conclusion was to recommend that a landowner be required to keep sanitary conditions to alleviate potential odor and/or flies. It was also the consensus that any pigs grandfathered and allowed to stay should be registered with Animal Control, sterilized, and vaccinated. Moreover, it was suggested that a microchip could be implanted under the pig's skin by Animal Control, which would allow tracking of the pig to ensure it is not replaced or move to another location in violation of the grandfathering clause. RECOAE%IENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners establish a policy to allow pet pigs in residential areas in cases where the pigs were kept as pets prior to May 1998, but only under the following conditions: 1. The pet pig owner must provide evidence that the pet pig was kept at a subject residence prior to May 1998. 2. The pet pig must be registered with Animal Control, sterilized, and vaccinated on a current basis. Moreover, the pig owner must pay to have a microchip installed on the pig for Animal Control tracking/record keeping purposes. 3. The area where the pet pig is allowed to roam outdoors must be cordoned off to prevent the pig from accessing within ten feet of a property line. 4. The outdoor location where the pig is allowed to roam must be completely screened from neighboring property by a fence and /or vegetation. On lots less than %z acre in size, a six-foot privacy is required for screening. 5. The outdoor location where the pig is allowed to roam must be kept sanitary to alleviate potential odors and infestation of flies. ATTACHED 1. Minutes excerpt of the April 6, 1999 BCC meeting 2. (Unapproved) minutes of the June 3, 1999 pig workshop. SEPTEMBER 7,1999 87 •