Laserfiche WebLink
or three years might be imposed as to when the home had to be built. <br />Commissioner Ginn felt that no one would buy an expensive lot along the river just <br />to build a dock and abuse the privilege but would eventually build a home there to enjoy the <br />river. She thought the Board should institute the change. <br />Commissioner Adams was concerned that initiating the change would be setting a <br />precedent because this was a personal request for one lot. She believed the LDR change <br />should be initiated by Mr. Collins and he should go through the public hearing process. <br />Chairman Macht felt this was not an isolated case which would benefit only one <br />property owner, but would apply to all property owners throughout the county. <br />Commissioner Stanbridge pointed out that staffindicated they would not recommend <br />such a change. She felt staff was right and agreed it needed to go through the public hearing <br />process. She MOVED to not direct staff to initiate an amendment to the LDRs. (Staff's <br />recommendation) <br />Mr. Collins advised that he had inquired if there was some other mechanism he could <br />go through and staff had advised there was not. He felt it was realistic to have a time limit <br />as to the construction of the residence since he would not go through the expense of <br />constructing a dock to let it deteriorate. <br />The Chairman ruled Commissioner Stanbridge's motion had died for lack ofa, second. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED <br />BY Commissioner Ginn, to allow Mr. Collins to initiate the <br />LDR change. <br />October 5, 1999 <br />44 <br />