My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/14/1999
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1999
>
10/14/1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:11:58 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 10:16:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/14/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners: <br />1. Determine whether or not it wants staff to initiate any changes to the existing PD <br />regulations. <br />2. If it is determined that changes are needed, direct staff to make changes to specific <br />PD elements and provisions. <br />Community Development Director Bob Keating stated that staffs' report is now <br />available on the Internet and can be located at: www.onebahamas.com/indianriver (the <br />County's current test site). He reviewed the Planned Development (PD) process as (1) <br />identify any problems; (2) discuss the advantages and disadvantages; (3) determine the need <br />for changes; and (4) consider any differences in the process for agricultural PDs. Zoning <br />was first regulated in the County in 1957, with the PD Ordinance being adopted in 1985 and <br />the first changes in 1991. There have been 56 PD applications since 1985, with 52 of those <br />approved. <br />The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard with <br />regard to this matter. <br />Frank Coffey, 5045 Fairways Circle, complimented staff for their efforts but felt the <br />process needs further review and clarification for developers. He referenced the recent <br />Citrus Springs application which had been approved by Planning & Zoning and staff. Once <br />that application was presented to the Board, it was revised to reflect the Commissioners' <br />comments and concerns, brought back before the Board and still got voted down. He <br />OCTOBER 14, 1999 _9_ <br />BOOK 111 PAGE �� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.