My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/14/1999
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1999
>
10/14/1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:11:58 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 10:16:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/14/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />800K I ill PAGE 17 <br />The requirement that lots and/or homesites in residential subdivisions on agriculturally designated <br />land be clustered and be approved as Agricultural PDs has been in the comprehensive plan since its <br />adoption in 1990. The first Agricultural PD was approved in 1994, and there have been one or two <br />Agricultural PDs approved each year since. In all, ten have been approved, and six have been built. <br />Attachment 1 shows the location of both the built and the unbuilt -but -approved Agricultural PDs. <br />The six that have been built contain a total of approximately 177 acres and 33 lots. Only one of the <br />built Agricultural PDs, located adjacent to the urban service area boundary, has connected to the <br />county water system. None has connected to the county wastewater system. All ten of these project <br />sites are located within one mile of the urban service area boundary, five in the south part of the <br />county and five in the central part of the county. These projects, all within the AG -1, Agricultural -1 <br />(up to 1 unit/5 acres) land use designation, range in size from 15 to 70 acres and from 3 to 9 lots. <br />Although the county's clustering requirement allows several types of clustering, each of the <br />approved Agricultural PD projects has been approved with the same clustering method: five acre lots <br />that contain one acre homesites, with the homesites "clustered" along an internal road. Other <br />clustering methods could include smaller lots with a large open space area. That open space area <br />could be owned by the developer, a property owners association, or an individual (perhaps a fanner <br />or a rancher). <br />Indian River County is not alone in requiring residential projects in agricultural areas to cluster. In <br />fact, most other Florida counties, including St. Johns, Charlotte, Madison, Jefferson, Volusia, St. <br />Lucie, Palm Beach, Hillsborough, and Orange, have comprehensive plan provisions which <br />encourage or require clustering of residential development in agricultural areas. Although these <br />provisions vary widely, Indian River County, in many respects, is typical among Florida counties <br />in terms ofwhen clustering is required, how much open space is required, overall density allowed, <br />and the provision of public services. <br />Some counties require clustering only of larger developments over a certain threshold in size (e.g., <br />20 units or 100 acres). Others offer clustering incentives such as density bonuses or streamlined <br />permitting. In Palm Beach County, clustering is required in order to achieve maximum density in <br />certain agricultural areas. <br />County Property Appraiser data from November 1998 indicate that many "ranchette" type lots <br />already exist outside the urban service area. A computer search at that time indicated that 476 <br />parcels (904.26 acres) of less than 200,000 square feet (4.59 acres) existed in the agriculturally <br />designated areas east of I-95 and those agriculturally designated areas around the City of Fellsmere. <br />The results of that search are shown in Table 1 below. Of the 476 parcels, 257 (439 acres) were <br />being used for residential purposes (231 contained a single-family house). Another 183 parcels (404 <br />acres) were available for residential development (e.g., vacant land, pasture, citrus groves, and <br />similar uses). <br />Table 1! AG -1 Designated Lots That Are 4.59 Acres Or Less INevemher 19981 <br />USE <br /># OF PARCELS <br /># OF ACRES <br />Single -Family <br />231 <br />405.48 <br />Mobile home <br />19 <br />19.20 <br />Other residential <br />7 <br />14.36 <br />Vacant land, pasture, citrus groves, & similar uses <br />183 <br />40426 <br />snace uses <br />36 <br />60.916 <br />TOTAL <br />476 <br />90426 <br />OCTO0 BER 14, 1999 , -16- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.