Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />BOOK W PAGE 25 <br />Director Keating stated that the first agricultural PD was approved in the County in <br />1994 and 10 have since been approved, all within one mile of the urban service area. These <br />were all 5 -acre lots with 1 -acre homesites. The Comp Plan has a year 2020 time horizon and <br />the County does not have any policies after the year 2020. It is important to consider now <br />these developments which will be there for 50, 60 or 70 years. The County has a population <br />Of 109,587 people now and in 2020 the population should be 154,000, using a low rate of <br />growth. There are 3 options for developing in agricultural areas: (1) exclusively agricultural <br />zoning; (2) extremely low density, and (3) clustered options. The County could (1) not <br />expand the urban service area; (2) allow a "leap -frog" expansion of the urban service area; <br />and/or (3) allow an incremental expansion of the urban service area. He suggested an <br />agricultural lot inventory to assist in determining whether to narrowly interpret clustering or <br />eliminate it. <br />Commissioner Stanbridge questioned the "leap -frog" concept concerning a "new <br />town" designation, and Director Keating responded that the use of that designation is not <br />considered to be leap -frogging. A "new town" has to be almost entirely self-contained and <br />must have a 6 -mile separation from another "new town" development. <br />In response to questioning, Director Keating believed the new development in <br />Fellsmere would not be a "new town" but a standard residential development. <br />Pat Brown expressed her concern about the character of the community. She is a <br />horse rider and a taxpayer and realizes that low-density land use growth will cost a lot. Also, <br />as a business person in the urban service area she has been impacted by the utility <br />assessments and has been told her property is more valuable because of these services. <br />0 OCTOBER 14, 1999 -24- <br />