Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Ginn believed the committee should select their own chairman and that <br />no Commissioners be on the committee. <br />Commissioner Adams agreed the Commissioners need not be on the committee. <br />Commissioner Ginn suggested they postpone this once more until Commissioner <br />Stanbridge returns so she can take part in the discussion. She suggested it be brought back <br />on the October 26' agenda; there were no dissenting comments. <br />13.C.4. COMMISSIONER GINN - ADDITIONAL HOMESTEAD <br />EXEMPTION - 65 AND OVER WITH INCOME UNDER $20,000 <br />The Commissioners reviewed backup for this item which can be found in the file. <br />(Bulletin PTA -99-06 from John R Everton, DOR) <br />Commissioner Ginn found this matter troubling. Initially, granting the additional <br />exemption sounded good, but it was difficult to get information concerning it. After studying <br />the additional information she had acquired, she felt that Commissioners needed more <br />information, the impact needed further study and complete evaluation needed to be done. <br />She felt there was insufficient time to give the matter proper consideration prior to the time <br />it would have to be accomplished to be effective for next year. She suggested that the Board <br />put it off for a year. <br />Chairman Macht believed it would be difficult for the Property Appraiser to <br />implement a program quickly enough to be available for next year and that it could be <br />opening the door to fraud as has happened in counties to the south. <br />Commissioner Adams agreed they did not know the full impact of any affect on the <br />county. She suggested that perhaps it would be best to have the first $25,000 value taxed <br />and, if they decided to grant it, that the additional exemption be applied to values above the <br />October 19, 1999 <br />70 <br />6 1* <br />