My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/19/1999
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1999
>
10/19/1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:11:59 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 10:17:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/19/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Ginn believed the committee should select their own chairman and that <br />no Commissioners be on the committee. <br />Commissioner Adams agreed the Commissioners need not be on the committee. <br />Commissioner Ginn suggested they postpone this once more until Commissioner <br />Stanbridge returns so she can take part in the discussion. She suggested it be brought back <br />on the October 26' agenda; there were no dissenting comments. <br />13.C.4. COMMISSIONER GINN - ADDITIONAL HOMESTEAD <br />EXEMPTION - 65 AND OVER WITH INCOME UNDER $20,000 <br />The Commissioners reviewed backup for this item which can be found in the file. <br />(Bulletin PTA -99-06 from John R Everton, DOR) <br />Commissioner Ginn found this matter troubling. Initially, granting the additional <br />exemption sounded good, but it was difficult to get information concerning it. After studying <br />the additional information she had acquired, she felt that Commissioners needed more <br />information, the impact needed further study and complete evaluation needed to be done. <br />She felt there was insufficient time to give the matter proper consideration prior to the time <br />it would have to be accomplished to be effective for next year. She suggested that the Board <br />put it off for a year. <br />Chairman Macht believed it would be difficult for the Property Appraiser to <br />implement a program quickly enough to be available for next year and that it could be <br />opening the door to fraud as has happened in counties to the south. <br />Commissioner Adams agreed they did not know the full impact of any affect on the <br />county. She suggested that perhaps it would be best to have the first $25,000 value taxed <br />and, if they decided to grant it, that the additional exemption be applied to values above the <br />October 19, 1999 <br />70 <br />6 1* <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.