Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />on-site, close to, or at buildings. Therefore, the proposed amendment would require special <br />buffering along the 98* Avenue frontage of the subject sites, as well as building color and signage <br />requirements, but would exempt special architectural/building and foundation planting requirements <br />for buildings that will be located "behind" the buffer. <br />Historic Buildings and Resources Exemption <br />As previously stated, the Board directed staff to include the proposed exemption for historic <br />buildings and structures in the current amendments to the SR 60 Corridor Plan regulations. The <br />wording proposed is the same wording approved as part of the recent amendments to the wabasso <br />Corridor Plan regulations. <br />The proposed exemption furthers a county comprehensive plan historic preservation objective and <br />is consistent with LDR Chapter 933 historic preservation regulations. The proposed amendment <br />would allow historic preservation aspects of a development/redevelopment project to override SR <br />60 foundation planting and architectural/building requirements where conflicts arise. <br />Under the wording proposed, the Historic Resources Advisory Committee would review proposals <br />where such conflicts arise and would make a recommendation to the Planning and Zoning <br />Commission regarding which SR 60 foundation planting or architecturallbuilding requirements to <br />waive and to what degree. During its review and approval of such a development/redevelopment <br />project, the Planning and Zoning Commission would be authorized to grant exemptions from SR 60 <br />requirements to ensure preservation of historical buildings/resources and their historical significance. <br />It should be noted that the proposed historic buildingtresources exemption wording is based upon <br />language from the comprehensive plan, Chapter 933, and historic buildings/ resources exemption <br />language used in the accessibility and building codes. <br />Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the proposed LDR amendment <br />ordinance. <br />OCTOBER 26, 1999 <br />0 <br />-67- BOOK Ill PAGE 183 <br />