My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/2/1999
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1999
>
11/2/1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:11:58 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 10:19:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/02/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />Chairman Macht advised that he had asked Mr. Coffey to limit his remarks to one <br />subject and, with the Board's approval, he would like to generally confine public discussion <br />items to a single subject. He could see this could lead to going on with many, many subjects. <br />He thought Mr. Coffey had agreed to do so. <br />Francis M. Coffey, 5045 Fairways, addressed the students saying "it is never too <br />early to get into community affairs." He thanked the Board for the opportunity to appear and <br />apologized for requesting to speak on four subject matters and advised he would confine his <br />remarks to one topic, the beach preservation program, as he had been requested. <br />Commissioner Ginn asked if this was a requirement or written somewhere, and <br />Chairman Macht advised that it was not, but he felt the Board needed to establish that as a <br />policy. He thought the Board ought to concentrate on one subject at a time and there are <br />always subsequent meetings for someone to address additional topics. <br />Commissioner Ginn did not have a problem with four topics as long as it doesn't go <br />on forever. <br />Mr. Coffey understood the need to have some rules, because it can be carried away <br />and he accepted that. He then reviewed the history of the Applied Technology & <br />Management (ATM) contract for the Beach Preservation Plan (BPP). He pointed out that <br />ATM has failed to meet time requirements as specified in their contract. It appeared that <br />ATM was in line to get the engineering/construction phase of the contract from the County. <br />He hoped they would be held more accountable to perform according to the contract and <br />recommended the Board adopt a policy to require them to make monthly or quarterly reports <br />depending on the length of the contract" He cited several examples why the BPP should be <br />revised to reflect the current environment He stated that the sand search was to have been <br />completed two years ago, but has not yet been done. He believed the Board had an <br />November 2, 1999 <br />33 <br />BOOK FAGUE '�' <br />C] <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.