Laserfiche WebLink
r -�� <br />BOOK F,�"E 6J!,jJ <br />It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County <br />Commissioners at its regular meeting of January 11, 2000. <br />This is a request by Suntree Partners, Inc., through its agent Knight, McGuire and Associates, Inc., <br />to rezone approximately 191.64 acres. Approximately 181.54 acres are zzoned -1plan <br />the <br />remaining 10 acres are zoned RS -3. As part of the PD rezoning request,conceptual <br />been submitted for review and approval. The subject site is located northeast of the intersection of <br />58'" Avenue and 9' Street SW, and runs north from 9" Street SW, across 5'" Street SW, to the South <br />Relief Canal. The purpose of this request is to secure a zoning which allows construction of single- <br />family homes on lots of various sizes, many of which are smaller that the RS -3 zoning district's <br />minimum lot size, and which also allows multi -family units and accessory commercial uses that <br />are internal to the project. <br />The project design is similar to the one considered by the Board of County Commissioners at its <br />meetings of July 13, 1999 and August 3, 1999 for a project also called "Citrus Springs". The main <br />differences between the original proposal, which was denied by the Board of County Commissioners <br />on August 3, 1999, and the subject proposal are that the current proposal covers an area 25.7 acres <br />smaller than the other proposal, proposes fewer units (477 vs 645), has a duplex component rather <br />than a triplex component, has less density (2.49 units/acre vs 2.96 unitstacre), and proposes fewer <br />waivers from RS -3 zoning district standards. <br />♦ Planning and Zoning Commission Action <br />At its regular meeting of December 9, 1999, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6-1 to <br />recommend approval of the conceptual plan and PD rezoning with the conditions recommended by <br />staff and one modified condition. That Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation for a <br />modified condition would require a Type "B" buffer with a 6' opaque feature along the project's <br />Lateral B Canal/58th Avenue frontage rather than the Type "C" buffer opaque feature proposed (see <br />attachment #5). <br />♦ Time Limit for Re -Applying <br />LDR section 902.12(5) states that, when a rezoning application has been previously acted upon by <br />the Board of County Commissioners, no new application for an amendment, change, or <br />modification of the official zoning atlas on substantially the same lands shall be permitted to be filed <br />until the expiration of at least 12 months from the filing of the previous application. Based on the <br />application covering substantially different property as well as the opinion of the County Attorney's <br />Office, staff determined that this proposal is to be treated as a new proposal and different from the <br />previous "Citrus Springs" proposal. Therefore, staff has not applied the 12 month waiting period <br />to this application. <br />♦ Development Approval Options Available to the Developer <br />Because most of the site is zoned A-1, Agricultural (1 unit / 5 acres), the applicant must rezone the <br />property to a residential zoning district to allow for residential development. Any rezoning action <br />must comply with the site's land use designation which is L-1, Low Density Residential I (up to 3 <br />unitstacre). There are two options available to the developer to seek approval of the proposed <br />project. Either of the two options, if approved, would allow the applicant to proceed with a <br />residential project. These options are as follows: <br />January 11, 2000 <br />28 <br />