Laserfiche WebLink
• • <br />9.A.3. PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED LAND DEVELOPMENT <br />REGULATION (LDR) AMENDMENTS - DEFINING YARDS THAT <br />ABUT LIMITED USE RIGHTS-OF-WAY AS SIDE YARDS AND USE <br />OF DOCKS/PIERS ON VACANT SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS (Legislative) <br />PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING <br />IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO IflE BOARD <br />Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed a Memorandum of January 26, 2000, using <br />graphics to illustrate examples of how the change defining yards would affect property <br />owners: <br />TO: James E. Chandler <br />County Administrator <br />DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE: <br />414.‘ FOIC- <br />Robert M. Keatin:, AICP <br />Community Development Director <br />4.6. <br />FROM: Stan Boling, AICP <br />Planning Director <br />DATE: January 26, 2000 <br />SUBJECT: Proposed (LDR) Land Development Regulation Amendments: Defining Yards <br />That Abut Limited Use Rights -of -Way as Side Yards, and Use of Docks/Piers <br />on Vacant Single -Family Lots <br />It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County <br />Commissioners at its regular meeting of February 1, 2000. <br />BACKGROUND; <br />Two proposed LDR amendments are now under consideration. The first amendment has been <br />initiated by public works and planning staff and proposes, for setback purposes, to define as side <br />yards any yard that abuts a limited use right-of-way (e.g. a right-of-way designated for uses other <br />than vehicular traffic such as for pedestrians, drainage, and utilities uses). The second amendment <br />has been initiated by the Board of County Commissioners to consider allowing use of docks and <br />private observation/fishing piers on vacant single-family lots. <br />The Professional Services Advisory Committee (PSAC) and Planning and Zoning Commission <br />(PZC) have considered these amendments and have made recommendations to the Board of County <br />Commissioners. Staff, PSAC, and PZC recommendations are noted for each proposed LDR <br />amendment in the analysis section of this report. <br />February 1, 2000 <br />49 <br />EOOK _L.. , ' AGL <br />