My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/7/2000
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2000
>
3/7/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:14:17 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 4:14:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/07/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0 <br />1. Appeal Letter <br />2. Planning and Zoning Commission Report with Approved Minutes <br />3. Section 932.06(3) <br />4. Section 914.13 <br />5. Section 902.07 <br />6. Applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies <br />Chairman Adams read the title of the matter and announced that while this appeared <br />in the agenda as a public hearing, it was not actually a public hearing but she would open the <br />matter to public comment and allow speakers. She pointed out it was a quasi-judicial matter. <br />Community Development Director Robert M. Keating commented that this was <br />actually a public discussion item that should have been listed under 9.B. He continued then <br />to give an overview of the issue and stated the concerns of the Planning and Zoning <br />Commission with building seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL). He <br />briefly explained staffs recommendation to overturn the PZC's decision and to grant the <br />major site plan and preliminary plat approval and advised of the conditions tied to staff's <br />recommendation to overturn the PZC's decision. He pointed out there are concerns as to <br />what effect an approval of the PZC's action would have on other projects, what the County's <br />position is on construction seaward of the CCCL, and the issues of whether this would be <br />considered a "taking" on the part of the County. <br />Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed the memorandum in detail and displayed <br />several drawings and aerial photographs to aid in his presentation. He pointed out the <br />CCCLs from 1981 and 1987 and explained the criteria necessary to build between the two <br />lines. He also used the drawings from pages 108 and 109 of the backup to show the <br />proposed residences and how they would be situated on the parcel and where they would be <br />located with respect to the CCCLs. He also displayed the landscape plan and described the <br />proposed buffers. He specified that a proposed tennis court would be eliminated in order to <br />leave the natural elements. <br />March 7, 2000 <br />51 <br />J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.