Laserfiche WebLink
F, <br />Subject Property 1 is not publicly owned, public control of the site has been secured through a <br />conservation easement to the County. <br />The remaining +0.54 acres of the ±1.93 acre parcel will be referred to as Subject Property 2 and <br />consist primarily of vacant uplands. This request involves rezoning Subject Property 2 from RS -1 <br />to RS -6, Single -Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre). <br />There are two purposes for this request. The first is to secure the necessary land use designation and <br />zoning to ensure that Subject Property 1's environmental significance will be preserved. The second <br />purpose of this request is to facilitate the development of a single-family house on Subject Property <br />2. Building setbacks within the existing RS -1 district (30 feet from all property lines) are designed <br />for lots of approximately one acre or larger. Within the proposed RS -6 district, setbacks (20 feet <br />from front and rear property lines, 10 feet from side property lines) provide more flexibility in <br />locating buildings. <br />At the January 27, 2000, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, the commission voted 6 to 0 <br />to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners redesignate Subject Property 1 to C-1, and <br />rezone Subject Property 2 to RS -6. Because of an advertising mistake the Planning and Zoning <br />Commission did not formally consider rezoning Subject Property 1 until February 10, 2000. At that <br />time the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 7 to 0 to recommend that the Board of County <br />Commissioners rezone Subject Property 1 to Con -1. <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review Procedures <br />The state allows local governments to use alternative adoption procedures for "small scale" plan <br />amendments that meet certain criteria. Section 163.3187(1)(c) of the Florida Statutes sets the <br />following criteria for small scale amendments: <br />1. The proposed amendment involves 10 or fewer acres; <br />2. The cumulative effect of the acreage for all small scale amendments in the jurisdiction does <br />not exceed 80 acres in a calendar year, <br />3. The proposed amendment does not involve the same property granted a land use designation <br />change within the prior 12 months; <br />4. The proposed amendment does not involve the same owner's property within 200 feet of <br />property granted a land use designation change within the prior 12 months; <br />5. The proposed amendment does not involve a change to the comprehensive plan's text; <br />6. The subject property is not within an area of critical state concern; and <br />7. The proposed amendment does not involve increasing residential density above 10 units/acre. <br />Small scale plan amendments are deemed to have fewer impacts than typical plan amendments and <br />are eligible for a streamlined adoption process. In contrast to typical plan amendments which require <br />review and approval by the State Department of Community Affairs (DCA), local governments may <br />adopt small scale plan amendments without review or approval by DCA. <br />The procedures for reviewing small scale comprehensive plan amendments are as follows. First, the <br />Planning and Zoning Commission conducts a public hearing to review the request. The Commission <br />March 21, 2000 <br />Gia <br />