My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/21/2000
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2000
>
3/21/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:14:17 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 4:17:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/21/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
173
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK 11,2, i ALE t _ 8 <br />The rezoning portion of the request, however, is to increase the density of ±0.54 acres (Subject <br />Property 2) from 1 unit/acre to 6 units/acre. For that reason, the rezoning portion of this request is <br />not exempt from the concurrency review. Therefore, the follow concurrency analysis was conducted <br />for the rezoning portion of the request. The site information used for the concurrency analysis is as <br />follows: <br />1. Size of Area to be Rezoned: 10.54 acres <br />2. Existing Zoning District: RS -1, Single -Family Residential District (up to 1 <br />unit/acre) <br />3. Proposed Zoning District: RS -6, Single -Family Residential District (up to 6 <br />units/acre) <br />4. Most Intense Use of Subject <br />Property under Existing <br />Zoning District: 1 single-family unit <br />5. Most Intense Use of Subject <br />Property under Proposed <br />Zoning District: 3 single-family units (Although the size and <br />environmental characteristics of the <br />subject property indicate that no <br />more than one single-family house <br />could be built on the site, regardless <br />of zoning district, for concurrency <br />purposes this staff report will <br />analyze the impacts of three single- <br />family units.) <br />Transportation <br />Three single-family units would be anticipated to generate 3 peak hour/peak season/peak direction <br />trips on the county's roadway network. Sufficient capacity to accommodate those trips exists on all <br />impacted roads. Impacted roads are defined in section 910.09(4)(b)3 of the county's LDRs as <br />roadway segments which receive five percent (5%) or more of the project traffic or fifty (50) or more <br />project trips, whichever is less. Because sufficient capacity is available, the existing level of service <br />on impacted roadways would not be lowered by the traffic generated by development of 3 single- <br />family units on Subject Property 2. <br />Water <br />Centralized potable water service is available to Subject Property 2 from the North County Reverse <br />Osmosis Plant. With the most intense use allowed under the proposed rezoning, Subject Property <br />2 will have a water consumption rate of 3 Equivalent Residential Units (ERU), or 750 gallons/day. <br />This is based upon a level of service standard of 250 gallons/ERU/day. Since the North County <br />Reverse Osmosis Plant currently has a remaining capacity of approximately 2,300,000 gallons/day, <br />the plant can accommodate the additional demand generated by the proposed zoning. <br />Wastewater <br />Although wastewater collection lines do not extend to Subject Property 2 at this time, the site is <br />located within the North County Wastewater Service Area. If a 3 unit residential project on Subject <br />March 21, 2000 <br />0 0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.