My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/9/2000
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2000
>
5/9/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:14:18 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 4:04:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/09/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK U FACE � <br />BACKGROUND: <br />Recently, staff initiated an LDR amendment regarding plan set submittal requirements, based upon <br />a request from the Fire Prevention Bureau, and paired that amendment with a request from the St. <br />Peter's Charter School to change certain setbacks for schools adjacent to non-residential sites. Each <br />of these amendments has been reviewed by the PSAC (Professional Services Advisory Committee) <br />and PZC (Planning and Zoning Commission) and are ready for Board of County Commissioners <br />consideration and action. <br />Plan Set Submittal/Resubmittal Requirements <br />Currently, the LDRs require seven (7) sets of site plan or plat drawings for each step in the submittal <br />and resubmittal review process for subdivision, site plan, and planned development (PD) projects. <br />Based upon a request from the Fire Bureau for an additional plan set for its initial project review (see <br />attachment #1), staff reviewed the current plan/plat set submittal requirements for all development <br />project types. Based upon its review of these requirements, staff is proposing changes to the number <br />of required plat/plan set drawings to be submitted during initial reviews and re -submittal review <br />steps of the subdivision, site plan, and PD processes. <br />At its regular meeting of March 16, 2000, the PSAC voted 4-2 to recommend that the Board of <br />County Commissioners adopt the proposed plan set submittal/resubmittal LDR amendment. <br />Separate from the LDR amendment proposal, at the request of the PSAC, staff is again researching <br />the issue of electronic plan submittals as an option to paper plan set submittals. In addition, staff and <br />the PSAC are working together to make the PSAC meeting packet completely electronic: beginning <br />this month, all PSAC packet materials will be "delivered" electronically only. <br />At its regular meeting of March 23, 2000, the PZC voted 7-0 to recommend that the Board adopt the <br />proposed plan set submittal/resubmittal LDR amendment (see attachment #4). <br />Special School Setbacks <br />St. Peter's Charter School has submitted an LDR amendment application to reduce a current <br />requirement for school building setbacks. St Peter's is seeking the reduction to accommodate a 110' <br />x 88' building on its site which is located in the RM -10 zoning district. The proposed IDR <br />amendment would apply countywide where school facilities are proposed adjacent to non-residential <br />uses that are not agricultural (e.g. commercial, industrial, office, institutional). <br />St. Peter's is requesting an amendment to LDR section 971.14(4)(d), a section which currently <br />requires a 100' setback from a school building to all property lines, even where a school site abuts <br />a non-residential use. While the applicant has not proposed any specific language, the applicant does <br />request that a setback reduction be allowed when a school building is proposed to be located adjacent <br />to non-residential uses. To facilitate consideration of St. Peter's request, staff has proposed language <br />similar to an existing provision in the LDRs which allows a reduction in buffer requirements when <br />a church facility is proposed to be located adjacent to other institutional (non-residential) uses (see <br />attachment #3). <br />At its regular meeting of March 16, 2000, the PSAC considered the proposed LDR amendment and <br />recommended approval. The PSAC recommendation included wording to expand the originally <br />proposed amendment language to allow a setback reduction in situations when the adjacent property <br />is zoned for non-residential uses (e.g. commercial zoning). Staff concurs with the PSAC's <br />recommendation and has included wording in the currently proposed LDR amendment wording to <br />implement the PSAC recommendation. <br />The PZC also considered the LDR amendment and voted 6-1 to recommend that the Board adopt <br />the special school setback LDR amendment (see attachment #4). <br />MAY 099 2000 <br />-42- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.