Laserfiche WebLink
-I <br />BOOK hJ PAGE 402' <br />the cost, because they would be taking off 50 feet. <br />There was a brief discussion and some misunderstanding as to which properties were able to <br />be subdivided. Commissioner Macht suggested that Community Development Director Robert M. <br />Keating and his staff be consulted as to which lots could be subdivided. That would determine <br />whether the owner should be charged on square footage or the 100 -foot rule. <br />Vice Chairman Ginn thought that was a good plan. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED BY <br />Commissioner Stanbridge, to approve staff's recommendation with <br />the understanding that staff has the authority, in consultation with the <br />Community Development Director, to determine which properties <br />should be assessed at the 100 -foot setback because they are not able <br />to be subdivided. <br />Chairman Adams asked if Director Hubbs was comfortable with the motion, and Director <br />Hubbs stated that his understanding was that the lots that cannot be subdivided practically would be <br />included in this motion. <br />Chairman Adams advised that his understanding was correct and there was a limited number <br />of those lots. <br />May 16, 2000 <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and <br />the motion carried unanimously. (Resolution No. <br />2000-061 adopted confirming the special assessments <br />in connection with a water main extension to Dixie <br />Heights, a portion of Dixie Gardens, and Piney Oaks <br />Subdivisions and providing for special assessment liens <br />to be made of record.) <br />34 <br />40 • <br />