My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/11/2000
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2000
>
7/11/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:14:18 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 3:41:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/11/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
199
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
As with all development, a more detailed review will be conducted during the development approval <br />process. <br />Recreation <br />A review of county recreation facilities and the projected demand that would result from the most <br />intense development that could occur on the subject property under the proposed land use <br />designation indicates that the adopted level of service would be maintained. The following table <br />illustrates the additional park demand associated with the proposed development of the property and <br />the existing surplus park acreage. <br />PARK INFORMATION <br />LOS (Acres per 1,000 Population) <br />Project Demand (Acres) <br />Surplus Park Acreage <br />4.0 <br />2.264 <br />1,164 <br />Concurrency Summary <br />Based on the analysis conducted, staff has determined that all concurrency -mandated facilities, <br />including drainage, roads, solid waste, water, wastewater, and parks have adequate capacity to <br />accommodate the most intense use of the subject property under the proposed land use designation. <br />While all services and facilities have adequate capacity to accommodate the most intense use of the <br />subject property under the proposed land use designation and zoning, this positive concurrency test <br />is not an indication that the subject property is currently appropriate for residential development at <br />an urban density. <br />Passing the concurrency test justifies the proposed land use amendment and rezoning only if the <br />proposed land use designation and zoning district are consistent with all other comprehensive plan <br />policies and compatible with surrounding areas. In Indian River County, available capacity for <br />services does not dictate development patterns; rather, the comprehensive plan dictates the location <br />of services. <br />Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies <br />of the Comprehensive Plan. As per section 800.07(1) of the County Code, the "Comprehensive Plan <br />may only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan pursuant to <br />Section 163.3177(2), F.S. " Amendments and rezonings must also show consistency with the overall <br />designation of land uses as depicted on the Future Land Use Map, which includes agricultural, <br />residential, recreational, conservation, and commercial and industrial land uses and their densities. <br />The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies <br />are statements in the plan that identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the <br />community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the <br />basis for all county land development decisions --including plan amendment and rezoning decisions. <br />While all comprehensive plan policies are important, some have more applicability than others in <br />reviewing plan amendment and rezoning requests. Of particular applicability for this request are the <br />following objectives and policies: <br />JULY 119 2000 <br />-126- <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.