Laserfiche WebLink
Non -Construction Costs <br />Impact Fees <br />Water/Sewer Connection <br />Permit & Related Fees <br />Professional & Design Fees <br />Mitigation <br />Geotechnical <br />Contingency <br />Subtotal — Non Construction Costs <br />GRAND TOTAL — Alt #1 <br />Revenue Option #3 <br />Overage/(Shonfall) <br />$ 100,711 <br />$ 3,250 <br />$ 17,335 <br />$ 249,070 <br />$ 7,500 <br />$ 3,500 <br />$ 50.000 <br />431 66 <br />$ 5,170,369 <br />$ 4.375.000 <br />($ 795,369) <br />Construction Alternative No. 2 <br />Reduce the size of the activity pool to 5,000 s.f instead of 7,000 sI, and/or eliminate movable <br />bulkheads and separate diving well in the Olympic pool. This would result in a less functional <br />facility, since 50 meter swimming and diving could not be performed simultaneously, but both pools <br />could be constructed to accommodate 25 yard and 50 meter swimming, diving, and activity pool. <br />The cost for Alternative No. 2 could be reduced to the Maximum Revenue scenario of $4,375,000. <br />Construction Alternative No. 3 <br />Eliminate the Activity Pool and only construct the Olympic Pool. <br />Construction Cost $ 3,824,352 <br />Non -Construction Cost S 431.366 <br />GRAND TOTAL $ 4,255,718 <br />Revenue Option #3 $ 4.375.000 <br />Overage/(Shortfall) $ 120,718 <br />Construction Alternative No. 4 <br />Eliminate the Olympic Pool and construct only the Activity Pool (7,000 s.f) <br />Construction Cost $ 3,033,502 <br />Non -Construction Cost $ 431.366 <br />GRANT TOTAL - $ 3,464,868 <br />Revenue Option #2 $ 3,875,000 <br />Overage/(Shon fall) S 410,132 <br />Any overage can fund ball field, playground, and other improvements. <br />DesignBuild Contract with Weller Pools and Construction Manager Services <br />To expedite pool and related facilities construction for Phase I, the Public Works Department staff <br />has considered the three conventional delivery systems for design/construction of the project. The <br />standard consultant design/advertise for bid/contract award to a General Contractor method is time <br />consuming and provides very little pre -construction input from the builder. On the other hand, the <br />second method, design/build, eliminates the competitive bid process and staff cannot compare the <br />guaranteed maximum price to other contractor prices. The third method, construction manager at <br />risk, allows a construction manager to work with the design team to design and supervise <br />construction of the project while working as an extension of the County staff to bring the project cost <br />below a guaranteed maximum price. The Construction Manager will retain subcontractors approved <br />by the County to actually construct the pool building and site infrastructure, with the exception of <br />the pools. <br />JULY 119 2000 <br />aid 114 PG 160 <br />is <br />-144- • <br />