Laserfiche WebLink
-I <br />TO: James E. Chandler <br />County Administrator <br />D ION HEAD CONCURRENCE: <br />r <br />y <br />Robert M. Keating, AICP <br />Community Development Director <br />146 <br />FROM: Stan Boling, AICP <br />Planning Director <br />DATE: July 6, 2000 <br />SUBJECT: Proposed LDR Amendment: SR 60 Corridor Freestanding Sign Regulations for <br />Areas Near I-95 <br />It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County <br />Commissioners, at the meeting of July 18, 2000. <br />BACKGROUND <br />On May 4, 1998, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the SR 60 Corridor Plan regulations <br />as part of the county's land development regulations (LDRs) (section 911.19). Those regulations <br />apply within the SR 60 Corridor, which is defined as the area between 26'e Street on the north and <br />16's Street on the south, and 102' Avenue on the west and 43rd Avenue on the east. Special <br />regulations within the corridor affect various development aspects including architecture, color, <br />landscaping, and signage. <br />The existing SR 60 Corridor regulations for freestanding commercial signs divide the corridor into <br />two areas: properties within 1,000 feet of I-95 entrance and exit ramps (east and west sides of I-95), <br />and all other properties within the corridor. Under the existing regulations, properties within the <br />1,000 foot areas are allowed freestanding signs that are significantly taller and larger than the <br />freestanding signs allowed in the remainder of the corridor. <br />Dan Bryant of Paradise Petroleum owns the existing gas station at the northeast comer of 90t6 <br />Avenue and SR 60. That site is located just east of the 1,000 foot I-95 area. Mr. Bryant has obtained <br />conditional site plan approval to redevelop and expand the existing gasoline station, subject to <br />compliance with all SR 60 Corridor Plan standards, including the current freestanding sign <br />limitations. Under the existing SR 60 Corridor regulations, redevelopment of the site requires <br />replacing the site's existing freestanding sign (perhaps as tall as 20', and perhaps as large as 150 sq. <br />ft.) with a conforming sign (10' monument -style, 50 sq. ft.). Mr. Bryant, through his attorney, Bruce <br />Barkett, is now requesting a change to the SR 60 Corridor regulations to establish a sign regulation <br />transition area between the 1,000 foot area and the remainder of the corridor. Under Mr. Bryant's <br />proposal, freestanding signs on sites located between 1,000 feet and 2,000 feet of I-95 ramps would <br />std be shorter and smaller than those located within 1,000 feet of the ramps but could be taller and <br />larger than those signs allowed on sites more than 2,000 feet from the ramps within the remainder <br />of the corridor (see attachment #1). Staff's proposed LDR amendment ordinance (see attachment <br />#3) differs from the applicant's proposal, as described in the analysis and alternatives section of this <br />report. <br />July 18, 2000 <br />46 <br />BK 1 14 PG 254 <br />0 0 <br />