7/18/2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Chairman Adams also preferred stags recommendation. She felt it would be easier for planning purposes to have only the three possibilities with the additional landscaping. She felt that 10 square feet per foot of height would be good. The choice of plants could be left to the owner's discretion, but there should be some understory plants that would work. County Attorney Bangel understood the motion on the floor to be approval of the third alternative. His concern was the exact language that would be in the ordinance for Alternative 3. He would be more comfortable if the new draft came back to them for adoption so the exact language would be before them. Vice Chairman Ginn thought that was a good point, then asked if there was time to bring it back in July. Director Boling responded that in the past the Board has voted their approval of an ordinance and staff has been authorized to make the revision and have the Chairman sign it. If staff has to come back with a revision, it probably would not be possible until the middle of August. Chairman Adams believed it was just a matter of whether the Board decided to go with the large or the small transition and landscape language needed to be added. County Attorney Bangel said that was the problem he had, unless they determine now what that language would be. Chairman Adams thought that could be done, and Vice Chairman Ginn thought staff's input on landscaping was needed. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion carried 4-1, with Commissioner Stanbridge opposed. (Alternative 3 with enhanced landscaping) Director Boling asked for a clarification of the motion, he understood that the Commissioners wanted included some specifications on the enhanced landscaping around the base of the signs. Chairman Adams concurred and added that was where County Attorney Bangel had some reservations. July 18, 2000 52 4 PG 260