My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/24/2000
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2000
>
7/24/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:14:19 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 3:43:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/24/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
After general discussion, Attorney Reid noted that the major concerns as he <br />understands them are: a guarantee that the minor league team will stay in Vero and more <br />protection from liability. His understanding of the MOU is that basically the County and the <br />City will be held harmless from liability. <br />Commissioner Ginn wanted stronger language about the disbursement of the capital <br />reserve fund, and Attorney Reid noted that even if the Dodgers chose to spend all of the <br />capital reserve today, they would still have the same obligations for the balance of the lease <br />term and those obligations would be enforceable. <br />Chairman Adams questioned whether the County would recoup its costs if the <br />Dodgers paid off the bonds and repurchased the property in 10 years, and Attorney Reid <br />replied that the costs are a part of the bond issue. Any costs are paid when the bonds are <br />issued and the bonds would be paid in full should the Dodgers leave. <br />Commissioner Macht noted that the discussion only involves the MOU and that the <br />Board would have final approval of the subsequent agreements. <br />Attorney Schutta asked for approval of the MOU "subject to approval by the 2 <br />attorneys" and noted that the entire deal is contingent upon the ancillary development by <br />deGuardiola. If he does not develop the project, all parties would be relieved of all <br />obligations. <br />Chairman Adams called for a brief recess at 3:35 p.m. and the meeting reconvened <br />at 3:55 p.m. with the same parties present. <br />Attorney Reid commented that the MOU is a statement of the understanding of the <br />big picture or a foundation of what is being envisioned. There are a lot of negotiations still <br />to come with the final agreements. <br />Administrator Chandler stated that if substantive changes are to be made in the MOU, <br />we would need to go back to negotiations. However, if there are only clarifications in <br />wording to be made, the MOU could be approved today. <br />311IMMOMMO <br />JULY 249 2000 -13- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.