My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/7/2000
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2000
>
9/7/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:14:19 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 3:29:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/07/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 30, 2000: <br />TO: Board of County Commissioners <br />DATE: August 30, 2000 <br />SUBJECT: Los Angeles Dodgers — Proposed Agreements <br />FROM: J es E. Chandler, County Administrator <br />The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) dated July 24, 2000 approved by the Board <br />provided that the parties would negotiate various agreements referenced in the MOU by not later <br />than September 1, 2000. The attached agreements have been negotiated by the parties in <br />accordance with the MOU and are hereby submitted to the Board with the recommendation that <br />such agreements be approved as to form and substance. If approved by the Board and, where <br />applicable, the Vero Beach City Council, the agreements will be made a part of the County's <br />application for State funding which must be submitted by October 1, 2000. The agreements will <br />be held by the County's bond counsel pursuant to the attached Document Escrow Agreement <br />pending the satisfaction of the various conditions specified in the MOU and as reflected in the <br />Document Escrow Agreement. <br />The Chairman then opened the floor to public comment on the remaining agenda <br />items concerning the Dodger matter. <br />Gene Winne, 2096 Windward Way, stated he was speaking as a board member and <br />vice president of the Civic Association. He advised that while the members of the Civic <br />Association are not against the Dodgers and hope they will remain in Vero Beach, they do <br />have strong objections to many features in the way it has been accomplished. He cited and <br />expanded on the following reasons for their objections. First, the public has never been <br />adequately informed about the negotiations; second, the County is providing major financial <br />assistance to a company controlled by one of the world's wealthier men; third, the positive <br />effects on the county's economy are less than claimed and no studies or alternatives have <br />been made available; fourth, it is a somewhat one-sided deal in favor of the Dodgers. He <br />September 7, 2000 <br />15 <br />BK 115 PG 019 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.